Back

Making cotton face masks extra-protective by use of impervious cloth as the front layer to restrict flow of aerosols and droplets

Shahane-Kapse, P. L.; Shende, M. R.; Kar, S.; Deshmukh, P.; Bhandari, D.; Narang, R.

2020-08-04 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.07.30.20165563
Show abstract

IntroductionOne of the important measures to prevent spread of COVID-19 in community is use of face mask. Though the debate is going on regarding the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 it makes reasonable point for universal use of face masks. A large variety of face masks are available in the market or people can make their own using household items. The efficacy of masks depends upon the type of cloth and number of layers of the cloth. Material and methodsWe have created an innovative mask with two layers of cotton and an impervious layer. The impervious layer made from polypropylene coated with polyurethane was applied on the outer side in the middle half of the mask in front of mouth and nose. The efficacy of this test mask was measured against N95FFR (reference standard), triple layer surgical masks and single layer cotton mask. A manikin was used wearing these masks/respirator and aerosols/droplets of diluted red coloured carbol fuchsin and fluorescent Auramine O were sprayed from distance of 1m and 2m. We also tested use of face shield. Both macroscopic and microscopic examination of the dissected masks and respirator was performed. ResultsThe N95FFR was able to block the aerosols/droplets by its front layer. One triple layer surgical mask showed microscopic presence of stain in its innermost layer while the other blocked it with middle layer. The single layer cotton mask was not able to protect as we observed stain on the face itself. The test mask blocked most of the stain on impervious layer and also on the front cotton layer on lateral sides, where impervious layer was absent. When fluorescent stain was used, ultraviolet examination demonstrated that the whole area covered by test mask was clean while the other non covered area was fluorescent. ConclusionWe believe that our innovation can be used in the community as well as in general areas of the hospital like, offices, labs, etc. and can be a better alternative to single use triple layer surgical masks. Further testing may be done by other organizations to rule out bias in our study.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 18%
20.5%
2
Journal of Hospital Infection
based on 21 papers
Top 0.2%
8.6%
3
American Journal of Infection Control
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
5.5%
4
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 2%
4.7%
5
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 4%
4.7%
6
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
based on 17 papers
Top 0.4%
2.9%
7
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 30%
2.9%
8
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 5%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 63%
2.4%
10
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
based on 16 papers
Top 0.9%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 12%
1.9%
12
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 19%
1.4%
14
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
based on 18 papers
Top 0.9%
1.4%
15
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 7%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 13%
1.4%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 14%
1.2%
18
JMIR Formative Research
based on 31 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
20
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 21%
0.7%
22
BioMed Research International
based on 11 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
24
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 22%
0.7%
25
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 12%
0.7%