Back

Blood Pressure and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Hyman, M. C.; Levin, M. C.; Gill, D.; Walker, V.; Georgakis, M. K.; Davies, N. M.; Marchlinski, F. E.; Damrauer, S. M.

2020-07-29 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.07.26.20162339
Show abstract

ImportanceObservational studies have shown an association between hypertension and atrial fibrillation (AF). Aggressive blood pressure management in patients with known AF reduces overall arrhythmia burden, but it remains unclear whether hypertension is causative for AF. ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between blood pressure and risk of AF using genetic proxies for blood pressure within a Mendelian randomization (MR) framework. We secondarily explored the relationship between genetically proxied use of anti-hypertensive drugs and risk of AF. DesignTwo-sample MR was performed using an inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis with weighted median MR and Egger intercept tests performed as sensitivity analyses. Genetic proxies for the anti-hypertensive drug classes were used to investigate the impact of these therapies on the risk of AF. SettingInternational Consortium of Blood Pressure, UK Biobank and Atrial Fibrillation Genetics Consortium. ParticipantsSummary statistics for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP) were obtained from the International Consortium of Blood Pressure and the UK Biobank discovery analysis (>750,000 individuals of European ancestry). Summary statistics for AF were obtained from the 2018 Atrial Fibrillation Genetics Consortium multi-ethnic GWAS (>65,000 AF cases and >522,000 referents). ExposureGenetically predicted SBP, DBP and PP as quantified by risk scores. Main OutcomeOdds ratio for AF per 10 mmHg increase in genetically proxied blood pressure. ResultsTen mmHg increases in genetically proxied SBP, DBP or PP were associated with increased odds of AF (SBP: OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.22, p=1[x] 10-11; DBP: OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16-1.35, p=3[x] 10-8; PP: OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2, p=0.05). Ten mmHg decreases in SBP estimated by genetic proxies of anti-hypertensive medications showed calcium channel blockers (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.57-0.76, p=8[x] 10-9) and beta-blockers (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.81, p=6[x] 10-4) decreased the risk of AF. Conclusions and RelevanceBlood pressure-increasing genetic variants were associated with increased risk of AF, consistent with a causal relationship between blood pressure and AF. These data support the concept that blood pressure reduction through pharmacologic intervention, and specifically calcium channel blockade or beta blockade could reduce the risk of AF.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 0.4%
13.0%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 1%
12.7%
3
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Hypertension
based on 20 papers
Top 0.5%
7.4%
5
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 0.9%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
4.4%
7
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
4.4%
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 4%
2.8%
9
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.7%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 63%
2.4%
11
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
12
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
2.3%
14
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 86%
2.2%
15
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
16
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 35%
1.3%
18
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
19
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 11%
1.3%
20
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 18%
1.2%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 7%
1.2%
22
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
23
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 30%
0.8%
24
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 51%
0.8%
25
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
0.7%