Back

TRANsCre-DIONE transdifferentiates scar-forming reactive astrocytes into functional motor neurons

An, H.; Lee, H.-L.; Cho, D.-W.; Hong, J.; Lee, H. Y.; Lee, J. M.; Woo, J.; Lee, J.; Park, M.; Yang, Y.-S.; Han, S.-C.; Ha, Y.; Lee, C. J.

2020-07-25 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.07.24.215160 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In spinal cord injury (SCI), the scar-forming reactive astrocytes with upregulated GFAP proliferate aberrantly near the injury site, allowing themselves as a prime target for transdifferentiation into neurons to replenish dead neurons. However, the conventional use of GFAP promoter to target reactive astrocytes has two inherent problems: inadvertent conversion of normal astrocytes and low efficiency due to progressive weakening of promoter activity during transdifferentiation. Here, we report that the scar-forming reactive astrocytes are selectively transdifferentiated into neurons with 87% efficiency and 96% specificity via TRANsCre-DIONE, a combination of the split-Cre system under two different promoters of GFAP and Lcn2 and a Cre-loxP-dependent inversion and expression of Neurog2 under the strong EF1 promoter. After SCI, TRANsCre-DIONE caused transdifferentiation into Isl1-positive motor neurons, reduced astrogliosis, enhanced regeneration in surrounding cells, and a significant motor recovery. Our study proposes TRANsCre-DIONE as the next-generation therapeutic approach for patients suffering from SCI. HighlightsTRANsCre-DIONE converts reactive astrocyte into neuron by over-expression of Neurog2 Reactive astrocytes are targeted using split-Cre under two promoters, GFAP and Lcn2 TRANsCre-DIONE reduces reactivity, replaces dead neurons and alleviates symptom of SCI Transdifferentiated-neurons are GABA+ in the striatum and Isl1+ in the spinal cord

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.