Distributional challenges regarding data on death and incidences during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic up to July 2020
Manz, K.; Mansmann, U.
Show abstract
COVID-19 is a major global crisis with unpredictable consequences. Many scientists have struggled to make forecasts about its impact. Especially, appropriate preparations for a second wave are needed not to move in a costly panic mode again. It is necessary to get ideas about worst case scenarios regarding incidences, hospitalization, or use of ICU resources. They can be described in terms of extreme quantiles (95%, 99%, 99.9%) of specific distributions that supposedly formalize the data mechanism behind future observations. Therefore, distributional issues do matter. Cirillo and Taleb argue that a natural and empirically correct framework for assessing and managing real risk in pandemics is provided by extreme value theory dealing with extrema and not averages. We explore this idea in more detail. In this paper we discuss the fat-tail patterns in the distribution of the global COVID-19 data by analyzing data from 66 countries worldwide. We also explore their relevance at a lower, regional scale perspective (national, federal state), which is in our opinion more relevant for planning measures against the epidemic spread. For this we analyze data from the German federal state of Bavaria. We conclude that fat-tail patterns are seen in global data, possibly reflecting the respective heterogeneity between different countries regarding incidences and fatalities during the ongoing epidemic. However, the disease activity at regional level seems to be better described by classical Poisson based models. To bridge the gap between regional and global phenomena we refer to mixtures of slim-tail distributions that may create fat-tail features. Especially in the beginning of a pandemic acting according to the "better safe than sorry" principle and taking extreme forecasts as the basis for the decisions might be justified. However, as the pandemic continues and control measures are partially lifted, there is a need for a careful discussion how to choose relevant distributions and their respective quantiles for future resource planning in order not to cause more harm as the pandemic itself.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking the Dynamics and Allocating Tests for COVID-19 in Real-Time: an Acceleration Index with an Application to French Age Groups and Départements * 95%
- The Acceleration Index as a Test-Controlled Reproduction Number: Application to COVID-19 in France* 95%
- Characterizing Two Outbreak Waves of COVID-19 in Spain Using Phenomenological Epidemic Modelling 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A new, simple method of describing COVID-19 trajectory and dynamics in any country based on Johnson Cumulative Distribution Function fitting 94%
- Model Based Estimation of the SARS-CoV-2 Immunization Level in Austria and Consequences for Herd Immunity Effects 94%
- Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of the time evolution of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Italy by a Gauss Error Function and Monte Carlo simulations 94%
- An improved mathematical prediction of the time evolution of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Italy, with Monte Carlo simulations and error analyses 94%
- Analysis of the prediction of the 2021 time-evolution of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Italy using a Planck’s distribution 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Burr distribution as a model for the delay between key events in an individual’s infection history 94%
- Appropriate relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions minimizes the risk of a resurgence in SARS-CoV-2 infections in spite of the Delta variant 93%
- A mechanistic and data-driven reconstruction of the time-varying reproduction number: Application to the COVID-19 epidemic 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.