Novel rabies virus variant for bi-directional optical control reveals modulatory influence of the pulvinar on visual cortex in rat
Scholl, L. R.; Zhang, L.; Foik, A. T.; Lyon, D. C.
Show abstract
Optogenetic tools have become of great utility in the causal analysis of systems in the brain. However, current optogenetic techniques do not reliably support both excitation and suppression of the same cells in vivo, limiting analysis and slowing research. Here we developed a novel glycoprotein-deleted rabies virus expressing two channelrhodopsin proteins, GtACR2 and Chrimson, in order to independently manipulate excitatory and inhibitory transmembrane potentials, respectively. Using this approach, we demonstrated that rodent pulvinar neurons modulate cortical size tuning and suppress flash responses, but do not drive activity in visual cortex. While our goal was primarily to develop this novel method to study the structure-function organization of thalamocortical circuits, this technique is readily applicable to study any brain region.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- AAV-PHP.S-mediated delivery of reporters to cranial ganglion sensory neurons 94%
- Bicistronic expression of a high-performance calcium indicator and opsin yields stable, robust cortical expression for holographic two-photon stimulation 93%
- Visual neuroscience methods for marmosets: efficient receptive field mapping and head-free eye tracking 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Unspecific expression in limited excitatory cell populations in interneuron-targeting Cre-driver lines can have large functional effects 91%
- Freely behaving mice can brake and turn during optogenetic stimulation of the Mesencephalic Locomotor Region 91%
- Weighting of celestial and terrestrial cues in the monarch butterfly central complex 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.