Neurovascular-modulation
Khadka, N.; Bikson, M.
Show abstract
Neurovascular-modulation is based on two principles that derive directly from brain vascular ultra-structure, namely an exceptionally dense capillary bed (BBB length density: 972 mm/mm3) and a blood-brain-barrier (BBB) resistivity ({rho} ~ 1x105 {Omega}.m) much higher than brain parenchyma/interstitial space ({rho} ~ 4 {Omega}.m) or blood ({rho} ~ 1 {Omega}.m). Principle 1: Electrical current crosses between the brain parenchyma (interstitial space) and vasculature, producing BBB electric fields (EBBB) that are > 400x of the average parenchyma electric field ([E]BRAIN), which in turn modulates transport across the BBB. Specifically, for a BBB space constant ({lambda}BBB) and wall thickness (dth-BBB): analytical solution for maximum BBB electric field (EABBB) is given as: ([E]BRAIN x {lambda}BBB) / dth-BBB. Direct vascular stimulation suggests novel therapeutic strategies such as boosting metabolic capacity or interstitial fluid clearance. Boosting metabolic capacity impacts all forms of neuromodulation, including those applying intensive stimulation or driving neuroplasticity. Boosting interstitial fluid clearance has broad implications as a treatment for neurodegenerative disease including Alzheimers disease. Principle 2: Electrical current in the brain parenchyma is distorted around brain vasculature, amplifying neuronal polarization. Specifically, vascular ultra-structure produces ~50% modulation of the average parenchyma electric field ([E]BRAIN) over the ~40 m inter-capillary distance. The divergence of EBRAIN (activating function) is thus ~100 kV/m2 per unit average parenchyma electric field ([E]BRAIN). This impacts all forms of neuromodulation, including Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), and transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques such a transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Specifically, whereas spatial profile of EBRAIN along neurons is traditionally assumed to depend on macroscopic anatomy, it instead depends on local vascular ultra-structure.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of galvanic vestibular stimulation electrode current density on brain current flow patterns: Does electrode size matter? 93%
- Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T - 10.5 T 93%
- Detailed measurements and simulations of electric field distribution of two TMS coils cleared for obsessive compulsive disorder in the brain and in specific regions associated with OCD 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.