Vesicle Navigation of Microtubule Ends Distinguished by A Single Rate-Constant Model
Gramlich, M. W.; Balseiro Gomez, S.; Tabei, S. M. A.; Parkes, M.; Yogev, S.
Show abstract
Axonal motor driven cargo utilizes the microtubule cytoskeleton in order to direct cargo, such as presynaptic vesicle precursors, to where they are needed. This transport requires vesicles to travel up to microns in distance. It has recently been observed that finite microtubule lengths can act as roadblocks inhibiting vesicles and increasing the time required for transport. Vesicles reach the end of a microtubule and pause until they can navigate to a neighboring microtubule in order to continue transport. The mechanism by which axonal vesicles navigate the end of a microtubule in order to continue mobility is unknown. In this manuscript we model experimentally observed vesicle pausing at microtubule ends in C. elegans. We show that a single rate-constant model reproduces the time vesicles pause at MT-ends. This model is based on the time a vesicle must detach from its current microtubule and re-attach to a neighboring microtubule. We show that vesicle pause times are different for anterograde and retrograde motion, suggesting that vesicles utilize different proteins at plus and minus end sites. Last, we show that vesicles do not likely utilize a tug-of-war like mechanism and reverse direction in order to navigate microtubule ends.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling myosin Va liposome transport through actin filament networks reveals a percolation threshold that modulates transport properties 96%
- PRC1 resists microtubule sliding in two distinct resistive modes due to variations in the separation between overlapping microtubules 95%
- A Mechanism for Neurofilament Transport Acceleration through Nodes of Ranvier 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.