Back

Demethylation and upregulation of an oncogene post hypomethylating treatment

Liu, Y.-C.; Fabiani, E.; Kwon, J.; Gao, C.; Falconi, G.; Valentini, L.; Gurnari, C.; Liu, Y. V.; Jones, A. I.; Yang, J.; Yang, H.; Thoms, J. A. I.; Unnikrishnan, A.; Pimanda, J. E.; Pan, R.; Voso, M. T.; Tenen, D. G.; Chai, L.

2020-07-26 oncology
10.1101/2020.07.21.20157776 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWhile hypomethylating agents (HMA) are currently used to treat myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and patients with cancer, their effects on reactivation and/or upregulation of oncogenes are generally not well elucidated. SALL4 is a known oncogene that plays an important role in MDS. In this study, we examined the impact of HMA on SALL4 methylation and expression. MethodsPaired bone marrow samples from a cohort of MDS patients on the BMT-AZA trial, collected before and after four cycles of azacytidine (AZA) treatment, were used to explore the relationship between changes in SALL4 expression, treatment response and clinical outcome with a follow-up of up to 40 months. No/low-SALL4 expressing leukemic cell lines were used to study the relationship between SALL4 methylation and expression. A novel locus-specific demethylation technology, CRISPR-DNMT1-interacting RNA (CRISPR-DiR), was used to identify the CpG island critical for SALL4 expression. ResultsIn MDS patients, we noted SALL4 upregulation after AZA treatment in 40% of the cases. Significantly, patients with SALL4 upregulation had a worse outcome. Using CRISPR-DiR, we discovered that demethylation of a 500bp CpG island within the 5UTR-Exon1-Intron1 region was critical for SALL4 expression. Importantly, in cell lines and patients, we confirmed that HMA treatment led to demethylation of the same CpG region and upregulation of SALL4 expression. ConclusionsCRISPR-DiR was useful to define the critical region important for gene activation. Along with analysis of patient samples, we demonstrated that demethylation and upregulation of an oncogene after HMA treatment can indeed occur and should be further studied.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.4%
6
Clinical and Translational Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
Blood Cancer Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
9
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
11
Haematologica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
13
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
HemaSphere
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
19
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
23
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
26
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.6%