Back

Aversive responses to L-arabinose in caterpillars of Helicoverpa armigera (H&uumlbner)

Sun, L.; Hong, Z.-Z.; Ma, Y.; Hou, W.; Liu, L.; Zhao, X.; Yan, F.; Yin, X.; Wang, C.-Z.; Tang, Q.

2020-10-21 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2020.07.20.213033 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Exploring botanical biopesticide is one of the eco-friendly approaches for pest control in current crop protection. L-arabinose, a plant-specific and less absorptive pentose, is known for its selective inhibitory effect on the sucrose digestion in mammals. In this study, we investigated the effects of L-arabinose on the feeding preference, the peripheral gustatory perception, the larval development, as well as the activity of intestinal sucrase of an insect pest species, the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in an attempt to explore the antifeedant activities of this pentose. The results showed that L-arabinose deterred the feeding preferences of H. armigera caterpillars for its two host plants and two phagostimulants, the tobacco, the pepper, the sucrose and the fructose. Gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) sensitive to L-arabinose were not found in the peripheral maxillary sensilla of H. armigera caterpillars, but the sensitivities of GRNs sensitive to sucrose, fructose and tobacco saps were suppressed by the additions of L-arabinose. Exposure of H. armigera caterpillars to dietary L-arabinose resulted in a prolonged larval developmental duration, a suppressed activity of intestinal sucrase and a reduced glucose level in midgut. In vitro, L-arabinose inhibited activities of the intestinal sucrase of H. armigera caterpillars in an uncompetitive manner. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that L-arabinose is a behavioral, gustatory and physiological inhibitor to caterpillars of the extremely generalist pest species H. armigera, suggesting the great potential of L-arabinose to be an effective antifeedant.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.