Back

Competition for electrons favors N2O reduction in denitrifying Bradyrhizobium isolates

Gao, Y.; Mania, D.; Mousavi, S. A.; Lycus, P.; Arntzen, M. O.; Lindstrom, K.; Shapleigh, J. P.; Bakken, L. R.; Frostegard, A.

2020-07-20 microbiology
10.1101/2020.07.20.212696 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bradyrhizobia are common members of soil microbiomes and known as N2-fixing symbionts of economically important legumes. Many are also denitrifiers, which can act as sinks or sources for N2O. Inoculation with compatible rhizobia is often needed for optimal N2-fixation, but the choice of inoculant may also have consequences for N2O emission. Here, we analyzed the phylogeny and denitrification capacity of Bradyrhizobium strains, most of them isolated from peanut-nodules. All were dinitrifiers, but only ~1/3 could reduce N2O while most others were net N2O producers. The N2O-reducing isolates showed strong preference for N2O- over NO3--reduction. Such preference was also observed in a study of other bradyrhizobia and tentatively ascribed to competition between the electron pathways to Nap (periplasmic NO3- reductase) and Nos (N2O reductase). Another possible explanation is lower abundance of Nap than Nos. Here, proteomics revealed that Nap was instead more abundant than Nos, supporting the hypothesis that the electron pathway to Nos outcompetes that to Nap. In contrast, Paracoccus denitrificans, which has membrane-bond NO3- reductase (Nar), reduced N2O and NO3- simultaneously. We propose that the control at the metabolic level, favoring N2O reduction over NO3- reduction, applies also to other denitrifiers carrying Nos and Nap but lacking Nar. Originality-Significance StatementThis study extends the current knowledge on denitrification in bradyrhizobia, which mostly originates from studies of one model strain, by investigating the denitrification phenotypes of a diverse collection of Bradyrhizobium isolates. Only 1/3 of them could reduce N2O while the others were net sources for this potent greenhouse gas. All N2O-reducers showed strong preference for N2O over NO3-. We revealed by proteomics that this was not explained by differences in the abundances of Nap (periplasmic nitrate reductase) and Nos (N2O reductase), which strengthens our hypothesis (Mania et al., 2020) of a metabolic control mechanism by which Nos competes efficiently with Nap for electrons, making these organisms strong sinks for N2O. The findings highlight the potential importance of these organisms as N2O sinks in natural and agricultural ecosystems and pinpoint the need to take N2O reduction into account, along with N2-fixation effectiveness, when searching for strains suitable for production of inoculants.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.