Examining COVID19 Positivity-Ratio Trends in US States from April-July: Are Rising Caseloads Attributable to <More Testing> and Do State Political-Affiliations Play a Role?
Sen, B. P.; Padalabalanarayanan, S.
Show abstract
ImportanceRising Covid19 cases in the US are attributed by some political leaders to more testing. Positivity-ratios (cases to tests ratio) in conjunction with cases and tests provide a better overview. However, comprehensive overviews of positivity-ratio patterns are scarce. ObjectiveTo examine trends in positivity-ratios, tests and cases by state from mid-April-mid-July. Further, to examine whether positivity-ratio patters are associated with state political-affiliations. MethodsState-level publicly available data on Covid19 is used. Seven-day moving averages (MA7) of positivity-ratio are computed for April 21-July 15. States are assigned to four groups based on patterns of change in positivity-ratio - higher at end of study period than beginning (Group 1), initial decline but subsequent increase starting Memorial Day weekend (Group 2), initial decrease but an upturn in last 14 days (Group 3), and consistent downward trend (Group 4). Political-affiliation is categorized as Republican-leaning if President Trump won the state and the governor is Republican. Additionally, a proxy measure is used to indicate intensity of Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests in the state. Associations are tested using chi-square analysis. ResultsFourteen states are in Group 1, fifteen states in Group 2, fifteen states in Group 3, and six states and DC in Group 4. 78.57% of Group 1, 33.33% of Group 2, 40% of group 3, and none in Group 4 were Republican-leaning. The difference in distribution was statistically significant (p<0.01). Distribution of high intensity BLM protests across the four groups was not statistically different (p>0.10). ConclusionIncreased Covid19 cases cannot be attributed to more testing. Indeed, the high positivity-ratios in most states indicate current testing is failing to capture actual infection rates. The association between state political-affiliation and positivity-ratios suggests Republican voters may be somewhat more skeptical of the gravity of the disease and emphasizes the importance of messaging by political leaders.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The COVID-19 health equity twindemic: Statewide epidemiologic trends of SARS-CoV-2 outcomes among racial minorities and in rural America 92%
- Understanding mental health trends during COVID-19 pandemic in the United States using network analysis 92%
- The Role of Testing Availability on Intentions to Isolate during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Late surges in COVID-19 cases and varying transmission potential partially due to public health policy changes in 5 Western states, March 10, 2020-January 10, 2021 93%
- Correction in Active Cases Data of COVID-19 for the US States by Analytical study 92%
- SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Potential and Policy Changes in South Carolina, February 2020 – January 2021 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial and ethnic disparities for SARS-CoV-2 positivity in the United States: a generalizing pandemic 92%
- Rapid Clinical Screening and Staging for COVID-19 Severe Outcome A Hospitalization Study in New York City 91%
- A Comprehensive County Level Framework to Identify Factors Affecting Hospital Capacity and Predict Future Hospital Demand 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phased implementation of COVID-19 vaccination: rapid assessment of policy adoption, reach and effectiveness to protect the most vulnerable in the US 91%
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 91%
- Differences in COVID-19 Risk by Race and County-Level Social Determinants of Health Among Veterans 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stay-at-home and face mask policies intentions inconsistent with incidence and fatality during US COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Strategies to Estimate Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Texas Vulnerable Population: Results from Phase I of the Texas Coronavirus Antibody REsponse Survey (TX CARES) 90%
- Budget Impact Analysis Of The Introduction Of Ranibizumabs Biosimilar To The Jordanian Joint Procurement System. 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.