Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of osteoarthritis: protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Singh, A.; Kotlo, A.; Dissanayaka, T.; WANG, Z.; Eathakkattu Antony, B. S.
Show abstract
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), which is considered as relatively safe, and offers a modest efficacy profile for the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. In view of the anecdotal evidence on its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties, HCQ has been used as an off-label option in patients with osteoarthritis (OA), mainly for the treatment of inflammatory OA. Recently, many investigators have evaluated the safety and efficacy of HCQ for the treatment of OA in various randomized control trials (RCTs). While most RCTs have evaluated the HCQ in inflammatory OA (erosive hand OA), there are studies constituting knee OA patients as well. Currently, there are no systematic reviews that have summarized the evidence on the efficacy and safety of HCQ in OA population. Hence, this study aims to systematically review the evidence from RCTs assessing the efficacy and safety of HCQ for the treatment of OA. Biomedical databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar will be searched to identify the RCTs of HCQ in patients with OA (hand, knee, hip, or any other OA). Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assess the quality of included studies. Review Manager 5 (Rev Man) and STATA Version 16 will be used to conduct the statistical analysis.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmacological treatment for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung involvement: Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses 92%
- Imbalanced Machine Learning Classification Models For Removal Biosimilar Drugs And Increased Activity In Patients With Rheumatic Diseases 92%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of Physician Global Assessment (PGA) in Systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of its psychometric properties 93%
- Clinical and Molecular Data to Predict Flares in DMARD optimization in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomised, Controlled, Open-label, Non-inferiority Trial 93%
- Different Covid-19 Outcomes Among Systemic Rheumatic Diseases: A Nation-wide Cohort Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 94%
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 92%
- The self-management support needs of people newly diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis: a realist review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk-stratified monitoring for sulfasalazine toxicity: prognostic model development and validation. 91%
- Validation of patient-reported outcome measures for dactylitis, psoriatic skin and nail disease, and uveitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis in routine care 91%
- Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA): clinical issues at early stages of disease 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
- Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trial to study co-administration of Ashwagandha on safety, immunogenicity, and protection with COVID-19 vaccine – A Study Protocol 92%
- Biologic Drug Survival in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review & Comparative Meta-Analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.