Back

Statistical classification of dynamic bacterial growth with sub-inhibitory concentrations of nanoparticles and its implications for disease treatment

Jones, A.-A. D.; Medina-Cruz, D.; Kim, N. Y.; Mi, G.; Bartomeu Garcia, C.; Baranda-Pellejero, L.; Bassous, N.; Webster, T. J.

2020-07-19 microbiology
10.1101/2020.07.19.210930 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nanoparticles are promising alternatives to antibiotics since nanoparticles are easy to manufacture, non-toxic, and do not promote resistance. Nanoparticles act via physical disruption of the bacterial membrane and/or the generation of high concentrations of reactive-oxygen species locally. Potential for physical disruption of the bacterial membrane may be quantified by free energy methods, such as the extended Derjuan-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek theory, which predicts the initial surface-material interactions. The generation of reactive-oxygen species may be quantified using enthalpies of formation to predict minimum inhibitory concentrations. Neither of these two quantitative structure-activity values describes the dynamic, in situ behavioral changes in the bacterias struggle to survive. In this paper, borrowing parameters from logistic, oscillatory, and diauxic growth models, we use principal component analysis and agglomerative hierarchical clustering to classify survival modes across nanoparticle types and concentrations. We compare the growth parameters of 170 experimental interactions between nanoparticles and bacteria. The bacteria studied include Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Helicobacter pylori, and were tested across multiple concentrations of liposomal drug delivery systems, amphiphilic peptide, and silver and selenium nanoparticles. Clustering reveals specific pairs of bacteria and nanoparticles where the nanoparticle induced growth dynamics could potentially spread the infection through the development of resistance and tolerance. This rapid screening also shows that bacteria generated nanoparticles do not induce growth modes indicative of the development of resistance. This methodology can be used to rapidly screen for novel therapeutics that do not induce resistance before using more robust intracellular content screening. This methodology can also be used as a quality check on batch manufactured nanoparticles.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.0%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.5%
5
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
12
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
17
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
18
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
22
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
26
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%