Back

Circulating Microparticles are increased amongst people presenting with HIV and advanced immune suppression in Malawi and correlate closely with arterial stiffness

Kelly, C.; Gurung, R.; Tinago, W.; Kamn'gona, R.; Sheha, I.; Chammudzi, M.; Jambo, K.; Mallewa, J.; Rapala, A.; Heyderman, R. S.; Mallon, P.; Mwandumba, H.; Khoo, S.; Klein, N.

2020-08-11 hiv aids
10.1101/2020.07.19.20157107 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesWe aim to investigate whether circulating microparticle (CMPs) subsets were raised amongst people presenting with HIV and advanced immune suppression in Malawi, and whether they associated with arterial stiffness. MethodsART-naive adults with a new HIV diagnosis and CD4 <100 cells/{micro}L had microparticle characterisation and carotid femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (cfPWV) at 2 weeks post ART initiation. HIV uninfected controls were matched on age, systolic BP and diastolic BP in a 1:1 ratio. Circulating microparticles were identified from platelet poor plasma and stained for endothelial, leucocyte, monocyte and platelet markers. ResultsThe median (IQ) total CMP count was 1 log higher in participants with HIV compared to those without (p<0.0001) and was associated with arterial stiffness (spearman rho 0.47, p<0.001). In adjusted analysis, every log increase in circulating particles showed a 20% increase in cfPWV (95% CI 4 - 40%, p=0.02). In terms of subsets, endothelial and platelet derived microparticles were most strongly associated with HIV. Endothelial derived E-selectin+ CMPs were 1.3log-fold higher and platelet derived CD42a+ CMPs were 1.4log-fold higher (both p<0.0001). Endothelial and platelet derived CMPs also correlated most closely with arterial stiffness [spearman rho: E-selectin+ 0.57 and CD42a 0.56, both p<0.0001). ConclusionsCirculating microparticles associate strongly with arterial stiffness among PLWH in Malawi. Endothelial damage and platelet activation are of particular importance and future translational studies should consider prioritising this pathway.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.