Pre-crastination: Time deadlines increase walking speeds even when not constraining
Tiew, E. H.; Srinivasan, M.
Show abstract
In many circumstances, humans walk in a manner that approximately minimizes energy cost. Here, we performed human subject experiments to examine how having a time constraint affects the speeds at which humans walk. First, we measured subjects preferred walking speeds to travel a given distance in the absence of any time constraints. Then, we asked subjects to travel the same distance under different time constraints. That is, they had to travel the given distance within the time duration provided - they can arrive early, but not late. Under these constraints, subjects systematically arrived earlier than necessary. Surprisingly, even when the time duration provided was large enough to walk at their unconstrained preferred speeds, subjects walked systematically faster than their unconstrained preferred speed. We propose that this faster-than-energy optimal speeds may be due to human uncertainty in time estimation. We show that a model assuming that humans perform stochastic optimal feedback control to arrive on time with high probability while minimizing expected energy costs predicts walking speeds higher than energy optimal, as observed in experiment.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive Multi-Objective Control Explains How Humans Make Lateral Maneuvers While Walking 95%
- Predicting gait adaptations due to ankle plantarflexor muscle weakness and contracture using physics-based musculoskeletal simulations 95%
- Elastic energy savings and active energy cost in a simple model of running 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying human adaptation to a novel split-belt walking condition after broad experience at different belt speeds 96%
- A Neuromuscular Model of Human Locomotion Combines Spinal Reflex Circuits with Voluntary Movements 95%
- Gait signature changes with walking speed are similar among able-bodied young adults despite persistent individual-specific differences 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.