Back
Surges in COVID-19 are led by lax government interventions in initial outbreaks
Yuan, H.-Y.; Wu, L.; Wang, D.-P.
2020-07-23
health policy
10.1101/2020.07.17.20156604
medRxiv
Show abstract
Sharp increases in COVID-19 cases occurred after reopening in the United States. We show that the post-intervention effective reproduction number is a strong predictor of the surge in late June. Lax interventions in the early stages coupled with elevated virus spread are primarily responsible for surges in most affected states.
Matching journals
●Non-profit
◐University press
○Commercial
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
●
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
23.2%
2
PLOS ONE
●
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.9%
3
Scientific Reports
○
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.4%
4
eLife
●
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
PNAS Nexus
◐
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
6
Science
●
429 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.6%
7
iScience
○
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
8
Nature Medicine
○
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Cell Systems
○
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Emerging Infectious Diseases
●
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Nature
○
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
●
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
13
Epidemics
○
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Nature Communications
○
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
15
BMC Public Health
○
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
16
Nature Aging
○
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Science Advances
●
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
18
Current Biology
○
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
19
Communications Biology
○
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
20
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
●
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
21
PLOS Digital Health
●
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Neuron
○
282 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
23
Mathematical Biosciences
○
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
○
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
GeoHealth
●
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%