Back

Surges in COVID-19 are led by lax government interventions in initial outbreaks

Yuan, H.-Y.; Wu, L.; Wang, D.-P.

2020-07-23 health policy
10.1101/2020.07.17.20156604 medRxiv
Show abstract

Sharp increases in COVID-19 cases occurred after reopening in the United States. We show that the post-intervention effective reproduction number is a strong predictor of the surge in late June. Lax interventions in the early stages coupled with elevated virus spread are primarily responsible for surges in most affected states.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
23.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.4%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.6%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.7%
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
10
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
13
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
15
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
16
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
18
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
20
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
21
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
23
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%