Training and reployment of non-specialists is an effective solution for the shortage of health care workers in the COVID-19 pandemic
Kuang, M.; Wu, J.; Luo, Y.; Xiao, H.; Liang, R.; Hu, W.; Cheng, S.; Zhou, Q.; Peng, S.; Cheng, K.; Xiao, H.
Show abstract
ImportanceIn the COVID-19 pandemic many countries encounter problems arising from shortage of specialists. Short intensive training and reployment of non-specialists is an option but the effectiveness is unknown. ObjectiveTo investigate whether there was difference in in-hospital mortality rates between COVID-19 patients managed by a mixed team (including non-specialists who had short intensive training and operated to a strict protocol) and those managed by a specialist team of health care workers. DesignCohort study, from January 26, 2020 to April 7, 2020, follow up to April 7, 2020. SettingMulticenter - Wuhan Hankou Hospital and Wuhan Xiehe Hospital, Wuhan, China. Participants261 HCWs deployed to Wuhan from Guangdong emergency rescue team and the 269 COVID-19 patients they treated. ExposureAmong 261 health care workers, 130 were in the specialist team and included 33 physicians, 32 of whom (97.0%) of whom were from relevant specialties. Each physician was in charge of 25-27 beds, with a 6-hour shift time. The mixed team included 131 health care workers, with 7 of the 28 physicians (25.0%) from relevant specialties. Each physician managed 12-13 beds, with a 4-hour shift time. Non-specialists received short-term intensive training and then followed strict management protocols. Specialists practiced as normal. Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcome was in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients. Another outcome was rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers. ResultsA total of 269 patients were included (144 male). In-hospital mortality rate of patients treated by the specialist teams and the mixed teams was 12.6% (20/159) and 12.7% (14/110) respectively (Difference = -0.1%, 95% CI -8.2% to 7.9%, p=.97). None of the health care workers were infected. Conclusions and RelevanceTraining and reployment of non-specialists is an effective solution for the shortage of health care workers in the COVID-19 pandemic. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWas there difference in mortality rates between COVID-19 patients managed by a mixed team (including non-specialists who had short intensive training and operated to a strict protocol) and those managed by a specialist team of health care workers (HCWs)? FindingsIn-hospital mortality rate among patients managed by specialist team (130 HCWs, 159 patients) and mixed team (131 HCWs, 110 patients) was 12.6% (20/159) and 12.7% (14/110) respectively (Difference = -0.1%, 95% CI -8.2% to 7.9%, p=.97). MeaningWith shortage of specialist HCWs, training and reployment of non-specialists is an effective option in the management of COVID-19 patients.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The experience of European hospital-based health care workers on following infection prevention and control procedures for COVID-19 95%
- Impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among health care workers in a secondary teaching hospital in Spain. 94%
- Risk perceptions and preventive practices of COVID-19 among healthcare professionals in public hospitals in Ethiopia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- High risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among frontline healthcare workers in Northeast Brazil: a respondent-driven sampling approach 94%
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 93%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers preparedness for COVID-19 pandemic in the occupied Palestinian territory: a cross-sectional survey 94%
- Healthcare workers experiences of working on the frontline and views about support during COVID-19 and comparable pandemics: A rapid review and meta-synthesis 93%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Half Year Longitudinal Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-antibodies and Rule Compliance in German Hospital Employees 91%
- Secondary traumatic stress and burnout in healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak 91%
- Prospective cohort study of socioeconomic status and subsequent unemployment under COVID-19 in Japan 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long-term symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of hospital employees: duration and predictive factors 90%
- Divergences on expected pneumonia cases during the COVID-19 epidemic in Catalonia: A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 6 million people 90%
- Increase in diagnoses associated with Post Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case-control study in the total population of Region Stockholm. 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.