Back

Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 train machine learning to assign likelihood of past infection during virus emergence in Sweden

Castro Dopico, X.; Hanke, L.; Sheward, D. J.; Muschiol, S.; Aleman, S.; Grinberg, N. F.; Christian, M.; Adori, M.; Perez Vidakovics, L.; Chang Il, K.; Khoenkhoen, S.; Pushparaj, P.; Moliner Morro, A.; Mandolesi, M.; Ahl, M.; Forsell, M.; Coquet, J.; Corcoran, M.; Rorbach, J.; Dillner, J.; Bogdanovic, G.; Mcinerney, G.; Allander, T.; Wallace, C.; Murrell, B.; Albert, J.; Karlsson Hedestam, G. B.

2020-10-19 allergy and immunology
10.1101/2020.07.17.20155937 medRxiv
Show abstract

Serological studies are critical for understanding pathogen-specific immune responses and informing public health measures1,2. Here, we evaluate tandem IgM, IgG and IgA responses in a cohort of individuals PCR+ for SARS-CoV-2 RNA (n=105) representing different categories of disease severity, including mild and asymptomatic infections. All PCR+ individuals surveyed were IgG-positive against the virus spike (S) glycoprotein. Elevated Ab levels were associated with hospitalization, with IgA titers, increased circulating IL-6 and strong neutralizing responses indicative of intensive care status. Additional studies of healthy blood donors (n=1,000) and pregnant women (n=900), sampled weekly during the initial outbreak in Stockholm, Sweden (weeks 14-25, 2020), demonstrated that anti-viral IgG titers differed over 1,000-fold between seroconverters, highlighting the need for careful evaluation of assay cut-offs for individual measurements and accurate estimates of seroprevalence (SP). To provide a solution to this, we developed probabilistic machine learning approaches to assign likelihood of past infection without setting an assay cut-off, allowing for more quantitative individual and population-level Ab measures. Using these tools, that considered responses against both S and RBD, we report SARS-CoV-2 S-specific IgG in 6.8% of blood donors and pregnant women two months after the peak of spring COVID-19 deaths, with the SP curve and country death rate following similar trajectories.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.