Back

Data-driven analysis of rat pup behavior reveals novel effects of maternal pre-conception exposure to nicotine

Torabi, R.; Jenkins, S.; Harker, A.; Whishaw, I. Q.; Gibb, R.; Luczak, A.

2020-07-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.07.16.206961 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We present a deep neural network for data-driven analyses of infant rat behavior in an open field task. The network was applied to study the effect of maternal nicotine exposure prior to conception on offspring motor development. The neural network outperformed human expert designed animal locomotion measures in distinguishing rat pups born to nicotine exposed dams versus control dams. Notably, the network discovered novel movement alterations in posture, movement initiation and a stereotypy in "warm-up" behavior (the initiation of movement along specific dimensions) that were predictive of nicotine exposure. The results suggest that maternal preconception nicotine exposure delays and alters offspring motor development. In summary, we demonstrated that a deep neural network can automatically assess animal behavior with high accuracy, and that it offers a data-driven approach to investigating pharmacological effects on brain development. SignificanceRelating neuronal activity to behavior is crucial to understand brain function. Despite the staggering progress in monitoring brain activity, behavioral analyses still do not differ much from methods developed 30-50 years ago. The reason for that is the difficulty for automated video analyses to detect small differences in complex movements. Here we show that applying deep neuronal networks for automated video analyses can help to solve this problem. More importantly, knowledge extracted from the network allowed to identify subtle changes in multiple behavioral components, which were caused by maternal preconception nicotine exposure in rat pups. Thus, the examples presented here show how neuronal networks can guide the development of more accurate behavioral tests to assess symptoms of neurological disorders.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.7%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 10%
9.8%
4
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
5
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
7
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
8
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
13
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
15
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
19
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
21
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
22
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%