Gender and trust in government modify the association between mental health and stringency of social distancing related public health measures to reduce COVID-19: a global online survey
O'Hara, L.; Abdul Rahmin, H. F.; Shi, Z.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo investigate the associations between stringency of COVID-19 social distancing policies and mental health outcomes, and the moderating effect of trust in government and gender. Design and settingCross sectional study involving secondary analysis of publicly available data from a global online COVID-19 survey and the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. Participants106,497 participants from 58 countries. Main outcome measuresOutcomes were a worries index and a depression index. Predictors were stringency of policies, trust in government, and gender. Multivariable regression was conducted to determine the three-way interaction between the predictor variables for mental health outcomes, adjusting for age, income and education. ResultsThe median age of participants (56.4% women) was 37 years (interquartile range 29 to 48 years). Women had higher worries and depression scores than men. 45.4% distrusted the government and 43.8% trusted the government to take care of its citizens. Among those who strongly trusted the government, an increase in the stringency of policies was associated with a significant increase in the worries index. Among men who distrusted the government, an increase in policy stringency was associated with an increase in the depression index but not the worries index. In women that strongly distrusted the government, there was an inversed U-shaped association between policy stringency and both the worries and depression indices. ConclusionAs the stringency of public health measures increases, so too do depression and worries. The association is moderated by gender and trust in government. For safe and effective public health measures, governments should develop strategies to increase trust in their actions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Public perspectives on social distancing and other protective measures in Europe: a cross-sectional survey study during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Gender and mental health of adolescents: a conceptual framework developed in a Delphi study 92%
- A national cross-sectional survey of public perceptions, knowledge, and behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racism in public health authorities - a scoping review and situational analysis 94%
- Intimate partner violence and its correlates in middle-aged and older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country secondary analysis 94%
- Is addressing violence against women prioritised in health policies? Findings from a WHO Policies Database 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia 93%
- Common Practices for Sociodemographic Data Reporting in Digital Mental Health Intervention Research: A Scoping Review 92%
- The use of social media platforms by migrant and ethnic minority populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: A longitudinal household cross-sectional study 92%
- Comparative analysis of policies and programs to support families and children during COVID-19 92%
- Capability impacts of the Covid-19 lockdown in association with mental well-being, social connections and existing vulnerabilities: an Austrian survey study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- SDG5 ‘Gender Equality’ and the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid assessment of health system responses in selected upper-middle and high-income countries 93%
- How does public knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors correlate in relation to COVID-19? A community-based cross-sectional study in Nepal 92%
- When mistrust in the government and scientists reinforce social inequalities in vaccination against Covid-19 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.