Back

Kinetics and Isotype Assessment of Antibodies Targeting the Spike Protein Receptor Binding Domain of SARS-CoV-2 In COVID-19 Patients as a function of Age and Biological Sex.

Graham, N. R.; Whitaker, A. N.; Strother, C. A.; Miles, A. K.; Grier, D.; McElvany, B. D.; Bruce, E. A.; Poynter, M. E.; Pierce, K. K.; Kirkpatrick, B. D.; Stapleton, R. D.; An, G.; Botten, J. W.; Crothers, J. W.; Diehl, S. A.

2020-07-22 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.07.15.20154443
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWSARS-CoV-2 is the newly emerged virus responsible for the global COVID-19 pandemic. There is an incomplete understanding of the host humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 during acute infection. Host factors such as age and sex as well the kinetics and functionality of antibody responses are important factors to consider as vaccine development proceeds. The receptor-binding domain of the CoV spike (RBD-S) protein is important in host cell recognition and infection and antibodies targeting this domain are often neutralizing. In a cross-sectional study of anti-RBD-S antibodies in COVID-19 patients we found equivalent levels in male and female patients and no age-related deficiencies even out to 93 years of age. The anti-RBD-S response was evident as little as 6 days after onset of symptoms and for at least 5 weeks after symptom onset. Anti-RBD-S IgG, IgM, and IgA responses were simultaneously induced within 10 days after onset, but isotype-specific kinetics differed such that anti-RBD-S IgG was most sustained over a 5-week period. The kinetics and magnitude of neutralizing antibody formation strongly correlated with that seen for anti-RBD-S antibodies. Our results suggest age- and sex-related disparities in COVID-19 fatalities are not explained by anti-RBD-S responses. The multi-isotype anti-RBD-S response induced by live virus infection could serve as a potential marker by which to monitor vaccine-induced responses.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 0.3%
12.6%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 33%
5.4%
3
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 0.6%
4.7%
4
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 16%
4.7%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 72%
4.5%
6
Clinical & Translational Immunology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
4.5%
7
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 1.0%
3.0%
8
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Nature Immunology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
2.8%
10
Vaccines
based on 131 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
11
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 4%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
12
PLOS Pathogens
based on 35 papers
Top 0.4%
2.5%
13
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
14
The Journal of Immunology
based on 19 papers
Top 0.7%
2.5%
15
Science Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.4%
2.5%
16
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 5%
1.9%
18
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
19
Journal of Clinical Investigation
based on 50 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
20
Cell
based on 28 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
22
npj Vaccines
based on 18 papers
Top 0.5%
1.3%
23
Cell Reports
based on 25 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
24
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 14%
1.2%
25
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Nature Microbiology
based on 21 papers
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
28
Vaccine
based on 140 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 18%
0.8%
30
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 22%
0.7%