Back

Chronotropic Incompetence Limits Aerobic Exercise Capacity in Patients Taking Beta-Blockers

Tysarowski, M.; Smarz, K.; Zaborska, B.; Pilichowska-Paszkiet, E.; Sikora-Frac, M.; Budaj, A.; Jaxa-Chamiec, T.

2020-07-17 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.07.15.20149005 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChronotropic incompetence in patients taking beta-blockers is associated with poor prognosis; however, its impact on exercise capacity (EC) remains unclear. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from consecutive patients taking beta-blockers referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing. EC was expressed as peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2; mL/kg/min). Chronotropic incompetence was defined as chronotropic index (CI) [&le;] 62%. CI was calculated as [(HR at peak-HR at rest) / (maximum predicted HR-HR at rest)] x 100%. ResultsAmong 140 patients all taking beta-blockers (age 61 {+/-} 9.7 years; 73% males), there were 113 (80.7%) patients with chronotropic incompetence. EC was lower in the group with chronotropic incompetence than the group without it, peak VO2 18.3 {+/-} 5.7 vs. 24.0 {+/-} 5.3 mL/kg/min, p < 0.001. In multivariate analysis EC correlated positively with CI ({beta} = 0.14, p < 0.001) and male gender ({beta} = 5.12, p < 0.001), and negatively with age ({beta} = -0.17, p < 0.001) and presence of heart failure ({beta} = -3.35, p < 0.001). Beta-blocker dose was not associated with EC. Partial correlation attributable to CI accounted for more than one-third of the variance in EC explained by the model. ConclusionsIn patients taking beta-blockers, presence of chronotropic incompetence was associated with lower EC, regardless of the beta-blocker dose. CI accounted for more than one-third of EC variance explained by our model. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIPatients on beta blockers with chronotropic incompetence have lower exercise capacity C_LIO_LIBeta-blocker dose is not associated with exercise capacity C_LIO_LIWe recommend incorporating chronotropic index into exercise stress testing C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.