10 Years of EPOC: A scoping review of Emotiv's portable EEG device
Williams, N.; McArthur, G. M.; Badcock, N. A.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDCommercially-made low-cost electroencephalography (EEG) devices have become increasingly available over the last decade. One of these devices, Emotiv EPOC, is currently used in a wide variety of settings, including brain-computer interface (BCI) and cognitive neuroscience research. PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to chart peer-reviewed reports of Emotiv EPOC projects to provide an informed summary on the use of this device for scientific purposes. METHODSWe followed a five-stage methodological framework for a scoping review that included a systematic search using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. We searched the following electronic databases: PsychINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. We charted study data according to application (BCI, clinical, signal processing, experimental research, and validation) and location of use (as indexed by the first authors address). RESULTSWe identified 382 relevant studies. The top five publishing countries were the United States (n = 35), India (n = 25), China (n = 20), Poland (n = 17), and Pakistan (n = 17). The top five publishing cities were Islamabad (n = 11), Singapore (n = 10), Cairo, Sydney, and Bandung (n = 7 each). Most of these studies used Emotiv EPOC for BCI purposes (n = 277), followed by experimental research (n = 51). Thirty-one studies were aimed at validating EPOC as an EEG device and a handful of studies used EPOC for improving EEG signal processing (n = 12) or for clinical purposes (n = 11). CONCLUSIONSIn its first 10 years, Emotiv EPOC has been used around the world in diverse applications, from control of robotic limbs and wheelchairs to user authentication in security systems to identification of emotional states. Given the widespread use and breadth of applications, it is clear that researchers are embracing this technology.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Distraction Impact of Concurrent Conversation on Event-Related Potential Based Brain-Computer Interfaces 96%
- Feeling Senseless Sensations: A Crossmodal study of mismatching tactile and virtual visual experience 94%
- Exploration of using "distance-to-bound" to manipulate the difficulty during motor imagery BCI training after stroke - A clinical two-cases study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- EEG in game user analysis: A framework for expertise classification during gameplay 96%
- Comparing P300 flashing paradigms in online typing with language models 96%
- Alpha Neurofeedback Training with a portable Low-Priced and Commercially Available EEG Device Leads to Faster Alpha Enhancement.A Single-blind, Sham-feedback Controlled Study & Methodological Review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A BCI-based vibrotactile neurofeedback training improves motor cortical excitability during motor imagery 95%
- Continuous Reaching and Grasping with a BCI Controlled Robotic Arm in Healthy and Stroke-Affected Individuals 94%
- Brain Dynamics of Spatial Reference Frame Proclivity in Active Navigation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.