A quantised cyclin-based cell cycle model
coulter, J.; Emerson, C.; Bennie, L.; Green, D.; Currell, F.
Show abstract
Computational modelling is an important research tool, helping predict the outcome of proposed treatment plans or to illuminate the mechanics of tumour growth. In silico modelling has been used in every aspect of cancer research from DNA damage and repair, tumour growth, drug/tumour interactions, and mutational status. Indeed, modelling even holds potential in understanding the interactions between individual proteins on a single cell basis. Here, we present a computational model of the cell cycle network of the cyclin family of proteins (cyclin A, B, D and E). This model has been quantised using western blot and flow cytometry data from a synchronised HUVEC line to enable the determination of the absolute number of cyclin protein molecules per cell. This quantification allows the model to have stringent controls over the thresholds between transitions. The results show that the peak values obtained for the four cyclins are similar with cyclin B having a peak values of 5x106 to 9x106 molecules per cell. Comparing this value with the number of actin proteins, 5E8, shows that despite their importance, the level of cyclin family proteins are approximately 2 orders of magnitude lower. The efficiency of the model presented would also allow for its use as an internal component in more complex models such as a tumour growth model, in which each individual cell would have its own cell cycle calculated independently from neighbouring cells. Additionally, the model can also be used to help understand the impact of novel therapeutic interventions on cell cycle progression. Author SummaryProtein and gene networks control every physiological behaviour of cells, with the cell cycle being controlled by the network of genes that promote the cyclin family of proteins. These networks hold the key to creating accurate and relevant biological models. Normally these models are presented with relative protein concentrations without any real world counterpart to their outputs. The model presented within shows and advancement of this approach by calculating the absolute concentration of each cyclin protein in one cell as it progresses through the cell cycle. This model employs Boolean variables to represent the genetic network, either the gene is active or not, and continuous variables to represent the concentrations of the proteins. This hybridised approach allows for rapid calculations of the protein concentrations and of the cell cycle progression allowing for a model that could be easily incorporated into larger tumour models, allowing for the tracking of discrete cells within the tumour.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Toward an optimal contraception dosing strategy 94%
- Quantification of long-term doxorubicin response dynamics in breast cancer cell lines to direct treatment schedules 93%
- A mechanistic model of the BLADE platform predicts performance characteristics of 256 different synthetic DNA recombination circuits 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- NetVA: An R Package for Network Vulnerability and Influence Analysis 91%
- Target2DeNovoDrugPropMax : a novel programmatic tool incorporating deep learning and in silico methods for automated de novo drug design for any target of interest 91%
- A program to automate the discovery of drugs for West Nile and Dengue virus -- programmatic screening of over a billion compounds on PubChem, generation of drug leads and automated In Silico modelling 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanistic modeling predicts efficacy of CISH knockout in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes with synergistic gene editing 93%
- The interaction between dynamic ligand signaling andepigenetics in Notch-induced cancer metastasis 92%
- Role of combined cell membrane and wall mechanicalproperties regulated by polarity signals in cell budding 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.