Back

Understanding site choice and competition through the adaptive dynamics of microbial settling strategy in a chemostat

Cai, Y.; Geritz, S. A. H.

2020-07-13 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.07.13.189662 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To understand the choice and competition of sites in nature, we consider an ecological environment in a chemostat consisting of a polymorphic microbial population that can float in the fluid or settle down on the wall of the chemostat. For the transition of a microbe from its floating state to its settled state at a particular settling rate involving the choice and competition of sites on the wall, we consider three different mechanisms: (i) unimolecular-Bourgeois settling, i.e., floaters land freely on the wall, but in an occupied site, the owner keeps the site (Bourgeois behaviour); (ii) unimolecular-anti-Bourgeois settling, i.e., floaters land freely on the wall, but in an occupied site, the intruder gets the site (anti-Bourgeois behaviour); (iii) bimolecular settling, i.e., floaters land only on the vacant sites of the wall. Employing the framework of adaptive dynamics, we study the evolution of the settling rate with different settling mechanisms and investigate how physical operating conditions affect the evolutionary dynamics. Our results indicate that settling mechanisms and physical operating conditions have significant influences on the direction of evolution and the diversity of phenotypes. (1) For constant nutrient input, theoretical analysis shows that the population is always monomorphic during the long-term evolution. Notably, the direction of evolution depends on the settling mechanisms and physical operating conditions, which further determines the composition of the population. Moreover, we find two exciting transformations of types of Pairwise Invasibility Plots, which are the gradual transformation and the bang-bang transformation. (2) For periodic nutrient input, numerical analysis reveals that evolutionary coexistence is possible, and the population eventually maintains dimorphism. Remarkably, for all three settling mechanisms, the long-term evolution leads to one of the two coexisting species settle down totally on the wall if the input is low-frequency but float entirely in the fluid if the input becomes high-frequency.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.1%
3
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
5
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
6
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
22
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%