Low-Dose Whole-Lung Radiation for COVID-19 Pneumonia
Hess, C. B.; Buchwald, Z. S.; Stokes, W.; Nasti, T. H.; Switchenko, J. M.; Weinberg, B. D.; Rouphael, N.; Steinberg, J. P.; Godette, K. D.; Murphy, D. J.; Ahmed, R.; Curran, W. J.; Khan, M. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundSafety of whole-lung low-dose radiation therapy (LD-RT) for COVID-19 pneumonia has been established in two phase I trials. By focally dampening pulmonary cytokine hyperactivation, LD-RT may improve outcomes in hospitalized and oxygen-dependent COVID-19 patients. MethodsPatients with COVID-19 pneumonia were treated with 1.5 Gy whole-lung LD-RT, followed for 28 days or at least until hospital discharge, and compared to an age- and comorbidity-matched control cohort. COVID-19-positive patients eligible for this protocol were hospitalized, had radiographic consolidations, and required supplemental oxygen. Efficacy endpoints were time to clinical recovery, radiographic improvement, and serologic responses. ResultsTen patients received whole-lung LD-RT between April 24 and May 24, 2020 and were compared to ten matched control patients, of whom six received COVID-directed therapy. Median time to clinical recovery was 12 days for the control cohort vs 3 days for LD-RT (HR 2.9, p=0.05). Median time to hospital discharge (20 and 12 days, p=0.19), and intubation rates (40% and 10%, p=0.12) were shorter for the LD-RT cohort. The LD-RT cohort had faster radiographic improvement (p=0.03), even among patients with high COVID burden. Serologic recovery in specific hematologic, cardiac, hepatic, clotting, and inflammatory markers occurred more rapidly following LD-RT than among matched controls. ConclusionsStrong efficacy signals, including a 3-fold risk reduction in time to clinical improvement, were observed following LD-RT compared to matched patients receiving COVID-directed therapy for COVID-19 pneumonia. Given the global availability of radiation accelerators, ongoing international efforts to investigate the optimal role of LD-RT in COVID-19 pneumonia are justified. Clinical Trial RegistrationNCT04366791.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in False Negative Rate of RT-PCR Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure 84%
- Trends in cancer incidence in younger and older adults: an international comparative analysis 83%
- Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine boosters against infection, hospitalization and death: a target trial emulation in the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant era 82%
Similar papers in this journal
- FLASH Radiotherapy Mitigates Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia and Prevents Immunosuppression via Chk1-STAT3 Axis Modulation in a Preclinical Thoracic Irradiation Model 97%
- Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract 94%
- Risk of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential after Cancer Radiation Therapy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- LITE SABR M1: a Phase I Trial of Lattice Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Large Tumors 95%
- Precision association of lymphatic disease spread with radiation-associated toxicity in oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas 95%
- Dosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disposable N95 Masks Pass Qualitative Fit-Test But Have Decreased Filtration Efficiency after Cobalt-60 Gamma Irradiation 86%
- Missing data in the medical record for oncology patients: prevalence and association with outcomes 85%
- Analysis of national and international guidelines on respiratory protection equipment for COVID-19 in healthcare settings. 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration of machine learning and genome-scale metabolic modeling identifies multi-omics biomarkers for radiation resistance 92%
- Hemoxygenase-1 as a key mediator of acute radiation pneumonitis revealed in a human lung alveolus-on-a-chip 91%
- Priming versus propagating: distinct immune effects of an alpha- versus beta-particle emitting radiopharmaceutical when combined with immune checkpoint inhibition 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.