Back

Poor correlation between antibody titers and neutralizing activity in sera from SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects

Criscuolo, E.; Diotti, R. A.; Strollo, M.; Rolla, S.; Ambrosi, A.; Locatelli, M.; Burioni, R.; Mancini, N.; Clementi, M.; Clementi, N.

2020-07-11 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.07.10.20150375
Show abstract

Plenty of serologic tests for SARS-CoV-2 have been developed so far, thus documenting the importance of evaluating the relevant features of the immune response to this viral agent. The performance of these assays is currently under investigation. Amongst them, LIAISON(R) SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG by DiaSorin and Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 cobas(R) by Roche are currently used by laboratory medicine hospital departments in Italy and many other countries. In the present study, we have firstly compared two serologic tests on serum samples collected at two different time points from forty-six laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 subjects. Secondly, eighty-five negative serum samples collected before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic were analyzed. Thirdly, possible correlations between antibody levels and the resulting neutralizing activity against a clinical isolate of SARS-CoV-2 were evaluated. Results revealed that both tests are endowed with low sensitivity on the day of hospital admission, which increased to 97.8 and 100% for samples collected after 15 days for DiaSorin and Roche tests, respectively. The specificity of the two tests ranges from 96.5 to 100%, respectively. Importantly, a poor direct correlation between antibody titers and neutralizing activity levels was evidenced in the present study.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 0.2%
13.0%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 41%
12.5%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 16%
10.1%
4
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 0.4%
5.3%
5
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 0.3%
5.0%
6
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 3%
4.5%
8
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 1%
2.9%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 5%
2.8%
10
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
12
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 6%
2.4%
13
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
2.3%
14
Infectious Diseases
based on 15 papers
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
based on 86 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
17
Microorganisms
based on 21 papers
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
based on 54 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
based on 15 papers
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
based on 22 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
based on 36 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 21%
0.7%
24
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 9%
0.7%