Back

Non contrast-enhanced imaging as a replacement for contrast-enhanced imaging for MRI automatic delineation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Wong, L. M.; Ai, Q.-Y. H.; Mo, F. K. F.; Poon, D. M. C.; King, A. D.

2020-10-20 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2020.07.09.20148817 medRxiv
Show abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) show potential for delineating cancers on contrast-enhanced MRI. However, there is world-wide interest in reducing the administration of MRI contrast agents. We aim to determine if CNNs can automatically delineate primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using the non contrast-enhanced (NE) T2-weighted fat-suppressed T1-weighted (CE-T1W) sequence. We retrospectively analyzed primary tumors in 201 patients with NPC. Six patients were randomly sampled as the training-validation group to avoid over-fitting, and the remaining 195 patients underwent validation analysis. We trained and tested a well-established two-dimensional CNN, U-Net, for tumor delineation on CE-T1W and T2W-FS sequences. CNN-derived delineations on CE-T1W and T2W-FS were compared with manual delineation using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average surface distance (ASD). Differences in DSC and ASD of CNN-derived delineations between CE-T1W and T2W-FS sequences were compared using the Wilcoxon rank test. CNN-derived primary tumor volumes (PTVs) on CE-T1W and T2W-FS were also compared with manual delineation using the Wilcoxon rank test. The CNNs tumor delineation performance on CE-T1W and T2W-FS showed no differences in DSC (0.71{+/-}0.09 vs. 0.71{+/-}0.09, p=0.50) and ASD (0.21{+/-}0.48cm vs. 0.17{+/-}0.19cm, p=0.34). The CNN-derived PTVs were larger than those from manual delineation on both CE-T1W (26.3{+/-}25.5cm3 vs. 23.5{+/-}26.6cm3, p<0.001) and T2W-FS (24.2{+/-}23.7cm3 vs. 23.2 {+/-} 26.2 cm3, p<0.001). In conclusion, CNN can automatically delineate primary NPC using the NE T2W-FS sequence which has the potential to be a substitute for the CE-T1W sequence. (T2W-FS) sequence and compare the performance with that from the contrast-enhanced

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.