Back

Solving the trade-off by differences in handling of intracellular K+: why substrate translocation by the dopamine transporter but not by the serotonin transporter is voltage-dependent

Shreyas Bhat; Marco Niello; Klaus Schicker; Christian Pifl; Harald H Sitte; Michael Freissmuth; Walter Sandtner

2020-07-11 biophysics
10.1101/2020.07.09.196642 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The dopamine transporter (DAT) retrieves dopamine into presynaptic terminals after synaptic release. The concentrative power of DAT is thought to be fueled by the transmembrane Na+ gradient, but it is conceivable that DAT can also rely on other energy sources, e.g. membrane voltage and/or the K+ gradient. Here, we recorded uptake of dopamine or the fluorescent substrate APP+ ((4-(4-dimethylamino)phenyl-1-methylpyridinium) in DAT-expressing cells under voltage control. We show that DAT differs substantially from the closely related serotonin transporter (SERT): substrate uptake by DAT was voltage-dependent, intracellular K+ binding to DAT was electrogenic but transient in nature thus precluding antiport of K+ by DAT. There is a trade-off between maintaining constant uptake and harvesting membrane potential for concentrative power. Based on our observations, we conclude that subtle differences in the kinetics of co-substrate ion binding allow closely related transporters to select between voltage-independent uptake and high concentrative power.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.