Back

Evolutionary Action Score of TP53 Mutations: Integrated Clinico-pathologic And Protein Structural Analysis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Guillermo Montalban-Bravo; Panagiotis Katsonis; Koji Sasaki; Caleb A. Class; Christopher Benton; Elias Jabbour; Kelly S. Chien; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Carlos E. Bueso-Ramos; Tapan Kadia; Michael Andreeff; Nicholas Short; Naval Daver; Mark J. Routbort; Joseph D. Khoury; Keyur Patel; Irene Ganan-Gomez; Yue Wei; Gautam Borthakur; Farhad Ravandi; Kim-Anh Do; Kelly A. Soltysiak; Olivier Lichtarge; L. Jeffrey Medeiros; Hagop Kantarjian; Guillermo Garcia-Manero

2020-07-08 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.07.08.194365 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ABSTRACTTo determine the impact of TP53 mutations on the phenotype and outcome of myelodysplastic syndromes, we quantified the deleterious effects of missense TP53 mutations using the computationally-derived evolutionary action score (higher score indicates worse impact), based on the phylogenetic divergence of the sequence position and amino acid change perturbation, and correlated with clinico-pathologic-genomic features in 270 newly-diagnosed TP53-mutant patients primarily treated with hypomethylating agents. Using recursive partitioning and regression trees, we identified a subset of patients with low-EAp53 mutations (≤52) with improved overall survival (OS) (n=17, 6%) compared to high-EAp53 (n=253, 94%) [median OS, 48 vs. 10 months; p=0.01]. Compared to high-EAp53, low-EAp53 patients had lower cytogenetic complexity, lower TP53 protein expression, lacked multi-allelic TP53 alterations, but had more somatic mutations in other genes. There was no difference in median TP53 variant allele frequency or distribution of R-IPSS. 3D-protein modeling showed clustering of poor-outcome mutations, indicating structural location influences outcome.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.