Back

COVID-19 incidence trends between April and June 2020: A global analysis

Amanor-Boadu, V.; Ross, K.

2020-07-07 health economics
10.1101/2020.07.07.20148007 medRxiv
Show abstract

The study sought to investigate how the number of confirmed cases of COVID-19 have evolved in the most recent three months across the world, and what insights the trends may provide about the second half of the pandemics first year using a situation analysis approach based on national income, temperature, trade intensity with China, and location defined by longitude and latitude. The study confirmed the negative relationship between COVID-19 cases and temperature. It contributed to the resolution of the conflicting results about latitude after organizing it into a categorical variable instead of its continuous form. This approach works because the average temperature in the 15{degrees}S to 15{degrees}N region remains similar to the average temperatures in both the Above 15{degrees}N region and the Below 15{degrees}S region during their summer months because the 15{degrees}S to 15{degrees}N region does not experience the marked seasonal changes in temperature. Given the negative association between temperature and case numbers, this suggests that countries in the 15{degrees}S to 15{degrees}N region might continue exhibiting the low numbers they have thus far exhibited through the second half of this year, even as numbers climb in the Below 15{degrees}S region. To succeed, their policymakers must control importation of the disease by implementing effective testing, quarantining, and contact tracing for people entering their borders. Policymakers in countries Below 15{degrees}S region may manage their inherent risks by applying lessons learned from countries in the Above 15{degrees}N region during these past months. Such preventative measures may allow the world to avoid the drastic lockdown policies and facilitate rapid global economic recovery from this pandemic.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.