Back

Impact of Congestive Heart Failure and Role of Cardiac Biomarkers in COVID-19 patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dalia, T.; Lahan, S.; Ranka, S.; Acharya, P.; Gautam, A.; Mastoris, I.; Sauer, A.; Shah, Z.

2020-07-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.07.06.20147421
Show abstract

ImportanceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been reported to cause worse outcomes in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease, especially in patients with acute cardiac injury, which is determined by elevated levels of high-sensitivity troponin. There is paucity of data on the impact of congestive heart failure (CHF) on outcomes in COVID-19 patients. ObjectiveTo evaluate the occurrence of acute cardiac injury and arrhythmias and to assess the impact of pre-existing CHF and hypertension (HTN) in COVID-19 patients. Data SourcesWe conducted a literature search of PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases from 11/1/2019 till 06/07/2020. databases using following search terms or keywords: "(COVID) AND (Clinical); ((heart) OR (myocard*)) AND (COVID); (COVID) AND (Troponin); (Coronavirus) AND (Heart)." Study SelectionWe identified all relevant studies reporting cardiovascular comorbidities, cardiac biomarkers, disease severity, and survival in COVID-19 patients. Data Extraction and SynthesisWe followed preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for abstracting data. Pooled data was meta-analyzed using random-effects model and between-study heterogeneity was calculated with Higgins I2 statistic. Main outcome and measuresTo assess the impact of HTN and CHF and to evaluate different cardiac biomarkers in COVID-19 patients based on their disease severity. ResultsWe collected pooled data on 5,967 COVID-19 patients from 20 individual studies. We found that both non-survivors and those with severe disease had an increased risk of acute cardiac injury and cardiac arrhythmias, our pooled relative risk (RR) was -- 8.52 (95% CI 3.63- 19.98) (p<0.001); and 3.61 (95% CI 2.03-6.43) (p=0.001), respectively. Mean difference in the levels of Troponin-I, CK-MB, and NT-proBNP was higher in deceased and severely infected patients. The RR of in-hospital mortality was 2.35 (95% CI 1.18-4.70) (p=0.022) and 1.52 (95% CI 1.12-2.05) (p=0.008) among patients who had pre-existing CHF and hypertension, respectively. Conclusion and RelevanceCardiac involvement in COVID-19 infection appears to significantly adversely impact patient prognosis and survival. Pre-existence of CHF, and high cardiac biomarkers like NT-pro BNP and CK-MB levels in COVID-19 patients correlates with worse outcomes.

Matching journals

1
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
#1
72× avg
2
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.2%
56× avg
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 3%
13× avg
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 1%
27× avg
5
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 18%
1.6× avg
6
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 68%
5.1%
7
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.5%
47× avg
8
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
26× avg
9
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 1.0%
27× avg
10
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 3%
8.8× avg
11
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
27× avg
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 7%
4.0× avg
13
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.8%
32× avg
14
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 66%
2.2%
15
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.9%
21× avg
16
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 3%
6.8× avg
17
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 2%
9.6× avg
18
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
18× avg
19
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
8.9× avg
20
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 18%
1.5× avg
21
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 6%
3.6× avg
22
BMJ
BMJ · based on 49 published papers
Top 8%
2.6× avg
23
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 99 published papers
Top 22%
0.6%