Does sub-Saharan Africa truly defy the forecasts of the COVID-19 pandemic? Response from population data
Christophe Dongmo, F. M.; Monique, A. N.; Amandus, A.; Momah, K. V.; Steve, M. F.; Simeon Pierre, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionSince its identification, the COVID-19 infection has caused substantial mortality and morbidity worldwide, but sub-Saharan Africa seems to defy the predictions. We aimed to verify this hypothesis using strong statistical methods. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study comparing the projected and actual numbers as well as population proportions of COVID-19 cases in the 46 sub-Saharan African countries on May 1st, May 29th (4 weeks later) and June 26th (8 weeks later). The source of the projected number of cases was a publication by scientists from the Center for Mathematical Modeling of Infectious Diseases of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, whereas the actual number of cases was obtained from the WHO situation reports. We calculated the percentage difference between the projected and actual numbers of cases per country. Further, "N-1" chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction were used to compare the projected and actual population proportion of COVID-19 cases, along with the 95% confidence interval of the difference between these population proportions. All statistical tests were 2-sided, with 0.05 used as threshold for statistical significance. ResultsOn May 1st, May 29th and June 26th, respectively 40 (86.95%), 45 (97.82%) and 41 (89.13%) of the sub-Saharan African countries reported a number of confirmed cases that was lower than the predicted number of 1000 cases for May 1st and 10000 for both May 29th and June 26th. At these dates, the population proportions of confirmed Covid-19 cases were significantly lower (p-value <0.05) than the projected proportions of cases. Across all these dates, South-Africa always exceeded the predicted number and population proportion of COVID-19 infections. ConclusionSub-Saharan African countries did defy the dire predictions of the COVID-19 burden. Preventive measures should be further enforced to preserve this positive outcome.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The last frontier for global Non-Communicable Disease action: the Emergency Department - a cross-sectional study from East Africa 95%
- The basic reproduction number of COVID-19 across Africa 94%
- Does the Data Tell the True Story? A Modelling Study of Early COVID-19 Pandemic Suppression and Mitigation Strategies in Ghana 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The toll of COVID-19 on African children: A descriptive analysis on the COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality among the pediatric population in Sub-Saharan Africa 95%
- Evaluating COVID-19 reporting data in the context of testing strategies across 31 LMICs 92%
- Early transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in South Africa: An epidemiological and phylogenetic report 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 in Uganda: Predicting the impact of the disease and public health response on disease burden 94%
- Relative burdens of the COVID-19, malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa 93%
- Transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in Ghana and the impact of public health interventions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.