Back

The projected impact of mitigation and suppression strategies on the COVID-19 epidemic in Senegal: A modelling study

Thompson, H. A.; Mboup, A.; Cisse, B.; Nayagam, S.; Watson, O. J.; Whittaker, C.; Walker, P. G. T.; Ghani, A. C.; Mboup, S.

2020-07-04 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.07.03.20144949 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPhysical distancing measures that reduce social contacts have formed a key part of national COVID-19 containment and mitigation strategies. Many Sub-Saharan African nations are now facing increasing numbers of cases of COVID-19 and there is a need to understand what levels of measures may be required to successfully reduce transmission. MethodsWe collated epidemiological data along with information on key COVID-19 specific response policies and health system capacity estimates for services needed to treat COVID-19 patients in Senegal. We calibrated an age-structured SEIR model to these data to capture transmission dynamics accounting for demography, contact patterns, hospital capacity and disease severity. We simulated the impact of mitigation and suppression strategies focussed on reducing social contact rates. ResultsSenegal acted promptly to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and as a result has reduced the reproduction number from 1.9 (95% CI 1.7-2.2) to 1.3 (95% CI 1.2-1.5), which has slowed but not fully interrupted transmission. We estimate that continued spread is likely to peak in October, and to overwhelm the healthcare system with an estimated 77,400 deaths (95% CI 55,270-100,700). Further reductions in contact rates to suppress transmission (Rt<1) could significantly reduce this burden on healthcare services and improve overall health outcomes. ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that Senegal has already significantly reduced transmission. Enhanced physical distancing measures and rapid scale up of hospital capacity is likely to be needed to reduce mortality and protect healthcare infrastructure from high levels of demand.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.6%
2
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
3
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
5
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.7%
7
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
11
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%
29
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%