Prevalence of HIV in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and associated outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ssentongo, P.; Heilbrunn, E. S.; Ssentongo, A. E.; Advani, S.; Chinchilli, V. M.; Nunez, J. J.; Du, P.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of HIV in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and delineating clinical outcomes including mortality. Design/MethodsMEDLINE, SCOPUS, OVID, and Cochrane Library databases and medrxiv.org were searched from January 1st, 2020, to June 15th, 2020. Data were extracted from studies reporting the prevalence of HIV among hospitalized COVID-19 patients and their clinical outcomes. Analyses were performed using random-effects models on log-transformed proportions and risk ratio estimates, and heterogeneity was quantified. ResultsA total of 144,795 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were identified from 14 studies in North America, Europe, and Asia. Median age was 55 years, and 66% were male. The pooled prevalence of HIV in COVID-19 patients was 1.22% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61%-2.43%)] translating to a 2-fold increase compared to the respective local-level pooled HIV prevalence in the general population of 0.65% (95% CI: 0.48%-0.89%). When stratified by country, the pooled HIV prevalence among COVID-19 patients in United States (1.43%, 95% CI: 0.98%-2.07%) was significantly higher compared to Spain (0.26%, 95% CI: 0.23%-0.29%) but was not different from China (0.99%, 95% CI: 0.25%-3.85%). The pooled mortality rate in HIV-positive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 was 14.1% (95% CI: 5.78%-30.50%) and was substantially higher in the United States compared to other countries. ConclusionsThe prevalence of HIV among COVID-19 patients appeared higher than the general population, suggesting a greater susceptibility to COVID-19 for PLWH. The pooled mortality rate is high, but the rates vary significantly across countries. Suggested ReviewersNelson Sewankambo, MD, PhD Makerere University College of Health Sciences Opposed Reviewers
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The global burden of HIV among Long-distance truck drivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Oral Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations 93%
- Protocol for a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of dolutegravir/lamivudine dual antiretroviral therapy (the PEDAL Study) in people living with HIV 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circumcision for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men: an updated meta-analysis 93%
- Interest in and preference for long-acting injectable PrEP among men who have sex with men, trans* individuals, and cis-gender heterosexual women: a global systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Outcomes among HIV-positive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of Point of Care HIV Viral Load Monitoring for People living with HIV in Low and Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review on Implementation Research Outcomes. 94%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 93%
- Association between virtual visits and health outcomes of people living with HIV: A cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Social Network Strategies to Distribute HIV Self-testing Kits: A Global Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis 92%
- Trends in CD4 and viral load testing 2005 to 2018: Multi-cohort study of people living with HIV in Southern Africa 92%
- Missed opportunities for HIV testing among those who accessed sexually transmitted infection (STI) services, tested for STIs and diagnosed with STIs: a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.