Associations between social support and verbal memory: 14-year follow-up of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing cohort
Scholes, S.; Liao, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveExamine the longitudinal associations between social support and verbal memory among community-dwelling adults. ParticipantsIn the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, 10,837 participants aged 50-89 years were assessed at wave 1 (baseline: 2002-03) and followed-up over 14-years to wave 8 (2016-17). MethodsVerbal memory was assessed at each wave by tests of immediate and delayed word-recall. Positive and negative social support were measured across four types of relationship (spouse/partner, children, friends, extended family). Linear mixed effects modelling examined the between-person (PM) and within-person (PM) associations between social support and verbal memory. Interaction terms were fitted to estimate differences in the rate of change in verbal memory by social support. ResultsWhen we summed scores across all relationships (global social support), higher-than-average (PM) positive social support was associated with higher baseline verbal memory ({beta}PM = 0.015; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.008, 0.025; p < 0.001) and with slower decline ({beta}PM-by-time = 0.003; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.005; p = 0.003). Longitudinal associations were gender- and source-specific. Among men, slower decline in verbal memory was associated with higher positive social support from children ({beta}PM-by-time = 0.009; 95% CI: 0.002, 0.016; p = 0.011) and with lower negative social support from spouse/partner ({beta}PM-by- time = -0.016; 95% CI: -0.031, 0.000; p = 0.045) and from friends ({beta}PM-by-time = -0.021; 95% CI: -0.039, -0.004; p = 0.018). Among women, higher positive social support from extended family was associated with slower decline in verbal memory ({beta}PM-by-time = 0.008; 95% CI: 0.000, 0.015; p = 0.049). ConclusionsBetween-person differences in social support were modestly associated with differential decline in verbal memory. Our findings can inform future research studies and intervention strategies designed to maximise the potential role of supportive relationships in promoting healthy cognitive ageing.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Health literacy, cognitive ability and self-reported diabetes in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing 93%
- The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam COVID-19 exposure index: a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of the pandemic on daily functioning of older adults 93%
- The Effects of COgNitive Training in Community-dwelling Older Adults at High Risk for demENTia (CONTENT): study protocol of two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Frailty and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: Examining reciprocal associations within a measurement burst design 94%
- Consequences of Heterogeneity in Aging: Parental Age at Death Predicts Midlife All-Cause Mortality and Hospitalization in a Swedish National Birth Cohort 90%
- Protocol for a randomised, double-blind trial of a chronotherapeutic mHealth behaviour change intervention to optimise light exposure among older adults aged >=60 years in Singapore (LightSPAN) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Loneliness and Cognitive Decline Among U.S. Adults: A Stratified Analysis of the BRFSS 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on psychosocial factors, health, and lifestyle in Scottish octogenarians: the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 Study 92%
- Social isolation is linked to classical risk factors of Alzheimer's disease-related dementias 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aging and COVID-19 mortality: A demographic perspective 89%
- A world apart: levels and factors of excess mortality due to COVID-19 in care homes. The case of Wallonia - Belgium. 88%
- Differential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on excess mortality and life expectancy loss within the Hispanic population 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.