Back
#1
22.9%
Top 52%
12.2%
Top 0.1%
8.0%
Top 0.5%
6.6%
Top 0.6%
6.1%
Top 0.4%
5.2%
Top 55%
5.2%
Top 0.4%
4.0%
Top 38%
4.0%
Top 6%
1.6%
Top 11%
1.4%
Top 14%
1.2%
Top 8%
1.0%
Top 59%
0.7%
Top 30%
0.7%
Top 9%
0.7%
Top 13%
0.7%
Top 26%
0.7%
Top 22%
0.7%
Top 38%
0.5%
Top 18%
0.5%
Is nasopharyngeal swab comparable with nasopharyngeal aspirate to detect SARS-CoV-2 in children?
2020-07-05
pediatrics
Title + abstract only
View on medRxiv
Show abstract
The tests currently used for the direct identification of SARS-CoV-2 include specimens taken from the upper and the lower respiratory tract. In our paediatric department all children undergo both nasopharyngeal swab and nasopharyngeal aspirate, performed from both nostrils, on admission and after 24 hours. We decided to compare these two methods of detection of SARS-CoV-2. Considering nasopharyngeal aspirate as the gold standard, we calculated sensitivities and specificities of nasopharyngeal ...
Predicted journal destinations
1
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 training papers
2
PLOS ONE
1737 training papers
3
Frontiers in Pediatrics
24 training papers
4
BMJ Paediatrics Open
20 training papers
5
Pediatric Research
15 training papers
6
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 training papers
7
Scientific Reports
701 training papers
8
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 training papers
9
BMJ Open
553 training papers
10
Vaccines
131 training papers
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
137 training papers
12
BMJ Global Health
95 training papers
13
Vaccine
140 training papers
14
Nature Communications
483 training papers
15
JAMA Network Open
125 training papers
16
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
50 training papers
17
Journal of Medical Virology
95 training papers
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
219 training papers
19
Cureus
64 training papers
20
PLOS Global Public Health
287 training papers
21
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
124 training papers