Heart Snapshot: a broadly validated smartphone measure of VO2max for collection of real world data
Webster, D. E.; Tummalacherla, M.; Higgins, M.; Wing, D.; Ashley, E.; Kelly, V. E.; McConnell, M. V.; Muse, E. D.; Olgin, J.; Mangravite, L.; Godino, J.; Kellen, M.; Omberg, L.
Show abstract
Expanding access to precision medicine will increasingly require that patient biometrics can be measured in remote care settings. VO2max, the maximum volume of oxygen usable during intense exercise, is one of the most predictive biometric risk factors for cardiovascular disease, frailty, and overall mortality.1,2 However, VO2max measurements are rarely performed in clinical care or large-scale epidemiologic studies due to the high cost, participant burden, and need for specialized laboratory equipment and staff.3,4 To overcome these barriers, we developed two smartphone sensor-based protocols for estimating VO2max: a generalization of a 12-minute run test (12-MRT) and a submaximal 3-minute step test (3-MST). In laboratory settings, Lins concordance for these two tests relative to gold standard VO2max testing was pc=0.66 for 12-MRT and pc=0.61 for 3-MST. Relative to "silver standards"5 (Cooper/Tecumseh protocols), concordance was pc=0.96 and pc=0.94, respectively. However, in remote settings, 12-MRT was significantly less concordant with gold standard (pc=0.25) compared to 3-MST (pc=0.61), though both had high test-retest reliability (ICC=0.88 and 0.86, respectively). These results demonstrate the importance of real-world evidence for validation of digital health measurements. In order to validate 3-MST in a broadly representative population in accordance with the All of Us Research Program6 for which this measurement was developed, the camera-based heart rate measurement was investigated for potential bias. No systematic measurement error was observed that corresponded to skin pigmentation level, operating system, or cost of the phone used. The smartphone-based 3-MST protocol, here termed Heart Snapshot, maintained fidelity across demographic variation in age and sex, across diverse skin pigmentation, and between iOS and Android implementations of various smartphone models. The source code for these smartphone measurements, along with the data used to validate them,6 are openly available to the research community.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A sweat lactate sensor for detecting anaerobic threshold in patients with heart failure: a prospective clinical trial (LacS-001) 93%
- Sociodemographic Characteristics of Missing Data in Digital Phenotyping 91%
- Ambulatory physiological measures obtained under naturalistic urban mobility conditions have acceptable reliability 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiovascular, respiratory and functional effects of tele-supervised home-based exercise training in individuals recovering from COVID-19 hospitalization: A randomized clinical trial 91%
- Descriptive epidemiology of cardiorespiratory fitness in UK adults: The Fenland Study 91%
- DeepACSA: Automatic segmentation of anatomical cross-sectional area in ultrasound images of human lower limb muscles using deep learning 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validity and reliability of an app-based medical device to empower individuals in evaluating their physical capacities 92%
- Effects of chemotherapy on skeletal muscle mitochondrial oxidative capacity using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS): Protocol paper for an observational mixed model repeated measures design in patients with breast and gynecological cancer 91%
- Connecting real-world digital mobility assessment to clinical outcomes for regulatory and clinical endorsement – the Mobilise-D study protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.