Mobbing-like response to secondary predator cues is not a form of teaching in meerkats

Across many taxa, individuals learn how to detect, recognise and respond to predators via social learning. Learning to recognise and interpret predator cues is essential in the accurate assessment of risk. Cues can come directly from a predators presence (visual, acoustic) or from secondary predator cues (SPCs, such as hair/feathers, urine or faeces) left in the environment. Animals show various responses to encountering SPCs, which are thought to act in reducing risk to the individual. Meerkats, Suricata suricatta, show a response to SPCs not described in any other species: they display a mobbing-like behaviour. The function of this behaviour is unclear as unlike mobbing, the response it so closely resembles, it cannot serve to drive predators away. We used experiments to investigate whether adults may use this mobbing-like response to teach naive young how to recognise and respond to predators. Meerkats are known to teach pups hunting skills, but there is as yet no evidence that any species other than humans teaches across multiple contexts. We used experimental presentations of SPCs to test whether wild adult meerkats respond more intensely to SPCs in the presence of naive pups, as would be expected if the behaviour serves to promote learning. Contrary to this prediction, response intensity was lower when pups were present than when they were absent, and declined as the number of pups in the group increased, possibly due to costs associated with foraging with dependent young. Response intensity instead increased with increasing group size, number of group members interacting with the cue, and varied with predator cue type. These results suggest that the mobbing-like response to SPCs is not a form of teaching in meerkats. Instead, this behaviour may function to increase the recruitment of others to investigate the SPC. Exposing group members to SPCs may better inform them of the nature of the threat, facilitating more effective defensive group responses.