Genetic risk factors for death with SARS-CoV-2 from the UK Biobank
Lu, C.; Gam, R.; Pandurangan, A. P.; Gough, J.
Show abstract
We present here genetic risk factors for survivability from infection by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) responsible for coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). At the time of writing it is too early to determine comprehensively and without doubt all risk factors, but there is an urgency due to the global pandemic crisis that merits this early analysis. We have nonetheless discovered 5 novel risk variants in 4 genes, discovered by examining 193 deaths from 1,412 confirmed infections in a group of 5,871 UK Biobank participants tested for the virus. We also examine the distribution of these genetic variants across broad ethnic groups and compare it to data from the UK Office of National Statistics for increased risk of death from SARS-CoV-2. We confidently identify the gene ERAP2 with a high-risk variant, as well as three other genes of potential interest. Although mostly rare, a common theme of genetic risk factors affecting survival might be the inability to launch or modulate an effective immune and stress response to infection from the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exome sequencing and analysis of 44,028 British South Asians enriched for high autozygosity 95%
- Biallelic variants in RNU2-2 cause a remarkably frequent developmental epileptic encephalopathy 93%
- Genome-wide analysis in 756,646 individuals provides first genetic evidence that ACE2 expression influences COVID-19 risk and yields genetic risk scores predictive of severe disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- What’s UPDOG? A novel tool for trans-ancestral polygenic score prediction 88%
- Genome-wide CRISPR screening identifies new regulators of glycoprotein secretion 87%
- Impact of baseline cases of cough and fever on UK COVID-19 diagnostic testing rates: estimates from the Bug Watch community cohort study 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.