Resting heart rate as a biomarker for tracking change in cardiorespiratory fitness of UK adults: The Fenland Study
Gonzales, T. I.; Jeon, J. Y.; Lindsay, T.; Westgate, K.; Perez-Pozuelo, I.; Hollidge, S.; Wijndaele, K.; Rennie, K.; Forouhi, N.; Griffin, S.; Wareham, N.; Brage, S.
Show abstract
AimsResting heart rate (RHR) is inversely associated with cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) but few studies have investigated the nature of this relationship in large population samples. We examined the association between RHR and CRF in UK adults and explored factors that may influence this relationship. Methods and ResultsIn a population-based sample of 5,143 men and 5,722 women (aged 29-65 years), mean (SD) RHR while seated, supine, and during sleep was 67.6 (9.8), 63.5 (8.9), and 56.9 (6.9) bpm, respectively. The age- and sex-adjusted association with CRF as assessed by submaximal treadmill testing was -0.26 (95%CI -0.27; -0.24), -0.31 (95%CI -0.33; -0.29), and -0.31 (95%CI -0.34; -0.29) ml O2 kg-1 beat-1. Sequential adjustment for objectively measured obesity and physical activity attenuated the RHR coefficient by 10% and 50%, respectively. In longitudinal analyses of 6,589 participants re-examined after 6 years, each 1 bpm increase in supine RHR was associated with 0.23 (95%CI 0.20; 0.25) ml O2 min-1 kg-1 decrease in CRF. ConclusionsAcross all measures, RHR is inversely associated with CRF; half of this association is explained by obesity and physical activity, suggesting CRF changes achieved through altered behaviour could be tracked through changes in RHR, a notion supported by longitudinal results. As well as its utility as a biomarker of CRF at population-level, serial measurements of RHR may facilitate personal goal setting/evaluation and remote patient monitoring.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Descriptive epidemiology of cardiorespiratory fitness in UK adults: The Fenland Study 96%
- Physical activity and posture profile of a South African cohort of middle-aged men and women as determined by integrated hip and thigh accelerometry 93%
- Evaluating a Genome-Wide Polygenic Score for Handgrip Strength and Its Interplay with Leisure-Time Physical Activity Across the IGEMS Twin Cohorts 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Joint association of genetic risk and accelerometer-based step count with cardiovascular disease: a UK-Biobank cohort study 92%
- Association of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Community 92%
- Shared and distinct pathways from anxiety disorder and depression to cardiovascular disease: a UK Biobank prospective cohort study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physical determinants of daily physical activity in older men and women 94%
- Longitudinal changes and key determinants of meeting WHO recommended levels of physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic in a UK-based sample: Findings from the HEBECO Study 93%
- Effects of physical activity and exercise on well-being in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal associations between physical activity and other health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: A fixed effects analysis 93%
- Aerobic capacity predicts skeletal but not cardiac muscle damage after a full distance Ironman triathlon - the Iron(wo)man-study 93%
- Modified Harvard Step Testing within a Clinic Setting Enables Exercise Prescription for Cancer Survivors 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Income-based inequalities in self-reported moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among adolescents in England and the United States: a cross-sectional study 93%
- Impact of social restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic on the physical activity levels of older adults: an analysis of the CHARIOT COVID-19 Rapid Response Study 93%
- Educational differentials in domain specific physical activity by ethnicity, age, and gender: findings from over 44,000 participants in The UK Household Longitudinal Study (2013-2015). 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.