Diverse local epidemics reveal the distinct effects of population density, demographics, climate, depletion of susceptibles, and intervention in the first wave of COVID-19 in the United States
Afshordi, N.; Holder, B.; Bahrami, M.; Lichtblau, D.
Show abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has caused significant mortality and morbidity worldwide, sparing almost no community. As the disease will likely remain a threat for years to come, an understanding of the precise influences of human demographics and settlement, as well as the dynamic factors of climate, susceptible depletion, and intervention, on the spread of localized epidemics will be vital for mounting an effective response. We consider the entire set of local epidemics in the United States; a broad selection of demographic, population density, and climate factors; and local mobility data, tracking social distancing interventions, to determine the key factors driving the spread and containment of the virus. Assuming first a linear model for the rate of exponential growth (or decay) in cases/mortality, we find that population-weighted density, humidity, and median age dominate the dynamics of growth and decline, once interventions are accounted for. A focus on distinct metropolitan areas suggests that some locales benefited from the timing of a nearly simultaneous nationwide shutdown, and/or the regional climate conditions in mid-March; while others suffered significant outbreaks prior to intervention. Using a first-principles model of the infection spread, we then develop predictions for the impact of the relaxation of social distancing and local climate conditions. A few regions, where a significant fraction of the population was infected, show evidence that the epidemic has partially resolved via depletion of the susceptible population (i.e., "herd immunity"), while most regions in the United States remain overwhelmingly susceptible. These results will be important for optimal management of intervention strategies, which can be facilitated using our online dashboard.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying the importance and location of SARS-CoV-2 transmission events in large metropolitan areas 94%
- Intra-county modeling of COVID-19 infection with human mobility: assessing spatial heterogeneity with business traffic, age and race 94%
- Dynamic Prioritization of COVID-19 Vaccines When Social Distancing is Limited for Essential Workers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial clustering in vaccination hesitancy: the role of social influence and social selection 95%
- A Modular Framework for Multiscale Spatial Modeling of Viral Infection and Immune Response in Epithelial Tissue 94%
- Mitigating outbreaks in congregate settings by decreasing the size of the susceptible population 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Role of high-dose exposure in transmission hot zones as a driver of SARS-CoV2 dynamics 94%
- Adaptive vaccination may be needed to eliminate COVID-19: Results from a runtime-alterable strain-drift and waning-immunity model 94%
- Medium-term scenarios of COVID-19 as a function of immune uncertainties and chronic disease 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.