Back

Inactivation of p21-Activated Kinase 2 (Pak2) Inhibits the Development of Nf2-Deficient Malignant Mesothelioma

Sementino, E.; Kadariya, Y.; Cheung, M.; Menges, C. W.; Tan, Y.; Kukuyan, A.-M.; Shrestha, U.; Karchugina, S.; Cai, K. Q.; Peri, S.; Duncan, J. S.; Chernoff, J.; Testa, J. R.

2020-07-01 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.06.30.181453 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Malignant mesotheliomas (MM) show frequent somatic loss of the NF2 tumor suppressor gene. The NF2 product, Merlin, is implicated in several tumor-related pathways, including p21-activated kinase (PAK) signaling. Merlin is both a phosphorylation target for PAK and a negative regulator of this oncogenic kinase. Merlin loss results in PAK activation, and PAK inhibitors hold promise for the treatment of NF2-deficient tumors. To test this possibility in an in vivo genetic system, Nf2f/f;Cdkn2af/f mice were crossed to mice with conditional knockout of Pak2, a highly expressed group I Pak member. Cohorts of these animals were injected in either the thoracic or peritoneal cavities with adeno-Cre virus to delete floxed alleles in the mesothelial lining. Loss of Pak2 resulted in a markedly decreased incidence and delayed onset and progression of pleural and peritoneal MMs in Nf2;Cdkn2a-deficient (NC) mice, as documented by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and in vivo bioluminescent imaging. RNA-seq revealed that MMs from NC;Pak2-/- mice showed downregulated expression of genes involved in several oncogenic pathways (Wnt, Akt) when compared to MMs from mice retaining Pak2. Kinome profiling showed that, as compared to NC MM cells, NC;Pak2-/- MM cells had multiple kinase changes indicative of an epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Collectively, these findings suggest that NC;Pak2-/- MMs adapt by reprogramming their kinome and gene signature profiles to bypass the need for PAK activity via the activation of other compensatory oncogenic kinase pathways. The identification of such secondary pathways offers opportunities for rational combination therapies to circumvent resistance to anti-PAK drugs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.1%
2
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.3%
4
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 22%
2.4%
9
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
10
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
17
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
NAR Cancer
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
21
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
22
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.6%