Back

Estimation of COVID-19 dynamics in the different states of the United States using Time-Series Clustering

Rojas, I.; Rojas, F.; Valenzuela, O.

2020-06-29 health informatics
10.1101/2020.06.29.20142364 medRxiv
Show abstract

Estimation of COVID-19 dynamics and its evolution is a multidisciplinary effort, which requires the unification of heterogeneous disciplines (scientific, mathematics, epidemiological, biological/bio-chemical, virologists and health disciplines to mention the most relevant) to work together in a better understanding of this pandemic. Time series analysis is of great importance to determine both the similarity in the behavior of COVID-19 in certain countries/states and the establishment of models that can analyze and predict the transmission process of this infectious disease. In this contribution, an analysis of the different states of the United States will be carried out to measure the similarity of COVID-19 time series, using dynamic time warping distance (DTW) as a distance metric. A parametric methodology is proposed to jointly analyze infected and deceased persons. This metric allows to compare time series that have a different time length, making it very appropriate for studying the United States, since the virus did not spread simultaneously in all the states/provinces. After a measure of the similarity between the time series of the states of United States was determined, a hierarchical cluster was created, which makes it possible to analyze the behavioral relationships of the pandemic between different states and to discover interesting patterns and correlations in the underlying data of COVID-19 in the United States. With the proposed methodology, nine different clusters were obtained, showing a different behavior in the eastern zone and western zone of the United States. Finally, to make a prediction of the evolution of COVID-19 in the states, Logistic, Gompertz and SIR model was computed. With these mathematical model it is possible to have a more precise knowledge of the evolution and forecast of the pandemic.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.1%
3
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
8
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
10
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
13
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
15
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
16
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
26
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%