Developmental models reveal the role of phenotypic plasticity in explaining genetic evolvability
Brun-Usan, M.; Rago, A.; Thies, C.; Uller, T.; Watson, R. A.
Show abstract
Biological evolution exhibits an extraordinary capability to adapt organisms to their environments. The explanation for this often takes for granted that random genetic variation produces at least some beneficial phenotypic variation for natural selection to act on. Such genetic evolvability could itself be a product of evolution, but it is widely acknowledged that the immediate selective gains of evolvability are small on short timescales. So how do biological systems come to exhibit such extraordinary capacity to evolve? One suggestion is that adaptive phenotypic plasticity makes genetic evolution find adaptations faster. However, the need to explain the origin of adaptive plasticity puts genetic evolution back in the driving seat, and genetic evolvability remains unexplained. To better understand the interaction between plasticity and genetic evolvability, we simulate the evolution of phenotypes produced by gene-regulation network-based models of development. First, we show that the phenotypic variation resulting from genetic and environmental change are highly concordant. This is because phenotypic variation, regardless of its cause, occurs within the relatively specific space of possibilities allowed by development. Second, we show that selection for genetic evolvability results in the evolution of adaptive plasticity and vice versa. This linkage is essentially symmetric but, unlike genetic evolvability, the selective gains of plasticity are often substantial on short, including within-lifetime, timescales. Accordingly, we show that selection for phenotypic plasticity is, in general, the most efficient and results in the rapid evolution of high genetic evolvability. Thus, without overlooking the fact that adaptive plasticity is itself a product of genetic evolution, this shows how plasticity can influence adaptive evolution and helps explain the genetic evolvability observed in biological systems.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular signatures of resource competition: clonal interference favors ecological diversification and can lead to incipient speciation 97%
- Promoting extinction or minimizing growth? The impact of treatment on trait trajectories in evolving populations 96%
- The diverse effects of phenotypic dominance on hybrid fitness 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene network simulations provide testable predictions for the molecular domestication syndrome 97%
- Genetic paths to evolutionary rescue and the distribution of fitness effects along them 96%
- Polygenic adaptation to an environmental shift: temporal dynamics of variation under Gaussian stabilizing selection and additive effects on a single trait 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.