Back

Mapping genetic effects on cellular phenotypes with "cell villages"

Mitchell, J. M.; Nemesh, J.; Ghosh, S.; Handsaker, R. E.; Mello, C.; Meyer, D.; Raghunathan, K.; de Rivera, H.; Tegtmeyer, M.; Hawes, D.; Neumann, A.; Nehme, R.; Eggan, K.; McCarroll, S. A.

2020-06-29 genetics
10.1101/2020.06.29.174383 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tens of thousands of genetic variants shape human phenotypes, mostly by unknown cellular mechanisms. Here we describe Census-seq, a way to measure cellular phenotypes in cells from many people simultaneously. Analogous to pooled CRISPR screens but for natural variation, Census-seq associates cellular phenotypes to donors genotypes by quantifying the presence of each donors DNA in cell "villages" before and after sorting or selection for cellular traits of interest. Census-seq enables population-scale cell-biological phenotyping with low cost and high internal control. We demonstrate Census-seq through investigation of genetic effects on the SMN protein whose deficiency underlies spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Census-seq quantified and mapped effects of many common alleles on SMN protein levels and response to SMN-targeted therapeutics, including a common, cryptic non-responder allele. We provide tools enabling population-scale cell experiments and explain how Census-seq can be used to map genetic effects on diverse cell phenotypes. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=185 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/174383v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (49K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@169bf4borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18dd9c0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d30ca5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e35bf0_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LICensus-seq reveals how inherited genetic variation affects cell phenotypes C_LIO_LIGenetic analysis of cellular traits in cell villages of >100 donors C_LIO_LICharacterizing human alleles that shape SMN protein expression and drug responses C_LIO_LIDevelopment of protocols and software to enable cellular population genetics C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.