Back

The SAGE genetic toolkit enables highly efficient, iterative site-specific genome engineering in bacteria

Elmore, J. R.; Dexter, G. N.; Francis, R.; Riley, L.; Huenemann, J.; Baldino, H.; Guss, A. M.; Egbert, R.

2020-06-28 synthetic biology
10.1101/2020.06.28.176339 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sustainable enhancements to crop productivity and increased resilience to adverse conditions are critical for modern agriculture, and application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) is a promising method to achieve these goals. However, many desirable PGPR traits are highly regulated in their native microbe, limited to certain plant rhizospheres, or insufficiently active for agricultural purposes. Synthetic biology can address these limitations, but its application is limited by availability of appropriate tools for sophisticated, high-throughput genome engineering that function in environments where selection for DNA maintenance is impractical. Here we present an orthogonal, Serine-integrase Assisted Genome Engineering (SAGE) system, which enables iterative, site-specific integration of up to 10 different DNA constructs at efficiency on par or better than replicating plasmids. SAGE does not require use of replicating plasmids to deliver recombination machinery, and employs a secondary serine-integrase to excise and recycle selection markers. Furthermore, unlike the widely utilized pBBR1 origin, DNA transformed using SAGE is stable without selection. We highlight SAGEs utility by constructing a 287-member constitutive promoter library with a [~]40,000-fold dynamic range in P. fluorescens SBW25. We show that SAGE functions robustly in diverse - and {gamma}-proteobacteria, thus providing evidence that it will be broadly useful for engineering industrial or environmental bacteria.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.