Readability of selected governmental and popular health organization websites on Covid-19 public health information: A descriptive analysis
Ojo, P. M.; Okeowo, T. O.; Thampy, A. M.; Kabir, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (USDHHS) recommends that health material be written at or below a sixth-grade reading level to ensure readability. The aim of this study was to examine the readability of international and national health organizations on Covid-19 information in their websites employing a previously validated tool. MethodsA purposive sample of publicly accessible governmental and popular international health organization websites was selected. The readability of the websites Covid-19 public health information was estimated using the previously validated SMOG readability formula, which determined reading level by correlating the number of polysyllabic words. ResultsOf the 10 websites included in the analysis, none had Covid-19 public health information at the USDHHSs recommended reading level. The material ranged in reading level at undergraduate level or above. DiscussionThe findings indicate that the online Covid-19 materials need to be modified in order to reach recommended reading levels. This study can be of practical use to policy makers and public health government officials when designing, modifying, and evaluating Covid-19 materials. We recommend using simple, non-polysyllable words to ensure that Covid-19 public health information materials are written at the recommended reading levels.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice related to the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia: a nationwide cross-sectional study 93%
- Strengthening government’s response to COVID-19 in Indonesia: a modified Delphi study of medical and health academics 93%
- Developing and validation of a questionnaire for assessment of individual's perceived risk of four major non-communicable diseases in Myanmar 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 93%
- Using rapid online surveys to assess perceptions during infectious disease outbreaks: a cross-sectional survey on Covid-19 among the general public in the United States and United Kingdom 92%
- Assessing the community risk perception toward COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea: evidence from Google and NAVER relative search volume 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A topic analysis of traditional and social media news coverage of the early COVID-19 pandemic and implications for public health communication 92%
- The psychological effects of COVID-19 on frontline healthcare workers and how they are coping: a web-based, cross-sectional study from Pakistan 92%
- Knowledge, attitude, and practices of Community pharmacists about COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey in two provinces of Pakistan. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining Australian's beliefs, misconceptions, and sources of information for COVID-19: A national online survey 95%
- Online information on face masks in Italian and English websites: deficiencies and responsibilities of search engines 92%
- COVID-19 Vaccine hesitancy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting intention to receive COVID-19 vaccine among the general population using the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior Model 91%
- The social media response to twice-weekly mass asymptomatic testing in England 90%
- When governments spread lies, the fight is against two viruses: A study on the novel coronavirus pandemic in Brazil 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.