Back

Ambient light and mimicry as drivers of wing transparency in Lepidoptera

Arias, M.; Barbut, J.; Rougerie, R.; Dutry, M.; Kohler, M.; Laulan, B.; Paillard, C.; Berthier, S.; Andraud, C.; Elias, M.; Gomez, D.

2020-09-18 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2020.06.26.172932 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transparency reduces prey detectability by predators. While transparent aquatic species hold higher transparency levels as the light availability of their habitat increases, less is known about such variation in terrestrial species. Lepidoptera species exhibiting transparent wings display various levels of transparency. Using two complementary approaches, we explore how the evolution of different transparency degrees relates to habitat openness, activity rhythm and mimicry syndrome (bee/wasp versus dead-leaf mimic). First, by exposing artificial moth-like prey to wild avian predators in a range of habitat openness, we show that survival is lower in more open habitats. We also found that less transparent morphs are more attacked than more transparent ones, regardless of habitat openness degree. Second, by analysing the evolution of wing features and ecological traits in 107 clearwing species, we found that diurnal species transmit more light than nocturnal species under certain conditions (when considering only forewings, at smaller clearwing surfaces and at larger wing lengths) and that species flying in open habitats and exhibiting large percentages of clearwing surface transmit slightly more light than those flying in closed habitats, although this is reversed at smaller percentages of clearwing surfaces. Additionally, bee/wasp mimics are more often diurnal and have higher and less variable light transmittances than dead-leaf mimics, which are more often nocturnal. Flying during the day, in open habitats and mimicking insects with transparent wings seem to promote high light transmittance under certain circumstances. Activity rhythm, habitat openness and species interactions play a crucial role in determining transparency design on land.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.8%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
16.9%
3
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
5
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
6
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
8
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
9
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
15
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
18
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
21
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Integrative And Comparative Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%