Back

Genomic and multi-tissue proteomic integration for understanding the biology of disease and other complex traits

Yang, C.; Farias, F.; Ibanez, L.; Sadler, B.; Fernandez, M.-V.; Wang, F.; Bradley, J.; Eiffert, B.; Bahena, J.; Budde, J.; Li, Z.; Dube, U.; Sung, Y. J.; Mihindukulasuriya, K.; Morris, J.; Fagan, A.; Perrin, R.; Benitez, B.; Rhinn, H.; Harari, O.; Cruchaga, C.

2020-06-26 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2020.06.25.20140277 medRxiv
Show abstract

Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping has successfully resolved some genome-wide association study (GWAS) loci for complex traits1-6. However, there is a need for implementing additional "omic" approaches to untangle additional loci and provide a biological context for GWAS signals. We generated a detailed landscape of the genomic architecture of protein levels in multiple neurologically relevant tissues (brain, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma), by profiling thousands of proteins in a large and well-characterized cohort. We identified 274, 127 and 32 protein quantitative loci (pQTL) for CSF, plasma and brain respectively. We demonstrated that cis-pQTL are more likely to be shared across tissues but trans-pQTL are tissue-specific. Between 78% to 87% of pQTL are not eQTL, indicating that protein levels have a different genetic architecture than gene expression. By combining our pQTL with Mendelian Randomization approaches we identified potential novel biomarkers and drug targets for neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal dementia. In the context of personalized medicine, these results highlight the need for implementing additional functional genomic approaches beyond gene expression in order to understand the biology of complex traits, and to identify novel biomarkers and potential drug targets for those traits.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.